Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, ATLANTISMAN said:

Careful I got banned for a similar comment a few months ago:(((

🤣🤣🤣 …yes a pal of mine did too, HKB, after someone accused him of making a strawman argument. It’s a terrible punishment, definitely to be avoided if possible. 

  • Haha 2

Posted
14 hours ago, Dave T said:

There just doesn't appear to be any buzz around the place tbh. It's all a bit lacklustre, I haven't really seen owt to convince me to go this year tbh. 

Clubs need to remember it's easy to now watch from home in comfort, they need to work harder to get people in. Warrington don't seem to be doing that. 

I do feel that the club feels a bit disengaged from it's fanbase. 

There seems to be no effort to promote the club. All the good things they did a few seasons ago with Wolfie seems to have been sidelined.

Was very flat at the Hull game, very, very disappointing considering other clubs have really stepped up there marketing and gamely experience. Even more disappointing when you consider we have a very high profile coach who you would think was very marketable in his own right.

If thinks don't improve off the field I can see we will see a big decrease in our attendances this season, not matter what the results are on the field.

 

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Posted
15 hours ago, Josef K said:

13,028 at Saints a decent crowd with it being so bloody cold, but it was down 400 on last year when we played them. 

9 hours ago, yipyee said:

Seemed to be a lot less leythers this year, plus we played them in the warmer summer months.

Leigh actually pre-sold 300 more tickets for Friday than the game last September. Not sure whether Saints had a few more on the gate that time because of the post semi-final rumblings.  

Posted

One thing that is interesting with all of these simultaneous games is that you get a sense of how telegenic the different games look. On Friday, the Wigan one looked much the best of the 3, in large part because of the lighting and the acoustics. 
 

While ours was the biggest crowd it was very largely home fans, and a lower proportion of the ground was filled than the other grounds. While the other 2 had more jeopardy for longer, I honestly think that it would have been more enjoyable watching the Wigan game than the others.
 

There was also the excitement of watching the World’s best club side, but even so. I don’t know how much it matters, or indeed whether it is fair but I wonder whether Saints and Wire have work to do on lighting, acoustics and atmosphere. All of which would improve the experience of being at the ground…
 

  • Haha 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, Exiled Wiganer said:

One thing that is interesting with all of these simultaneous games is that you get a sense of how telegenic the different games look. On Friday, the Wigan one looked much the best of the 3, in large part because of the lighting and the acoustics. 
 

While ours was the biggest crowd it was very largely home fans, and a lower proportion of the ground was filled than the other grounds. While the other 2 had more jeopardy for longer, I honestly think that it would have been more enjoyable watching the Wigan game than the others.
 

There was also the excitement of watching the World’s best club side, but even so. I don’t know how much it matters, or indeed whether it is fair but I wonder whether Saints and Wire have work to do on lighting, acoustics and atmosphere. All of which would improve the experience of being at the ground…
 

Interesting.

I thought the Saints game looked way better than Wigan on TV.

  • Like 2
Posted
13 minutes ago, Archie Gordon said:

Interesting.

I thought the Saints game looked way better than Wigan on TV.

I did too, Wigan games (other than the WCC) always seem flat. 

Posted
5 hours ago, Archie Gordon said:

Interesting.

I thought the Saints game looked way better than Wigan on TV.

Yup. Not even close.

Build a man a fire, and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. (Terry Pratchett)

Posted
19 minutes ago, Tommygilf said:

732 ish 

I admire an 'approximately 732' far more than an 'approximately 730'.

  • Haha 1

Build a man a fire, and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. (Terry Pratchett)

Posted
9 minutes ago, Jill Halfpenny fan said:

How do you feel about an actual 727?

Is that like a baby Boeing?

  • Like 1

Build a man a fire, and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. (Terry Pratchett)

Posted
2 hours ago, EggFace said:

Looks awful on Tv.

You don't say! 😀😀

Bernard Manning lives! Welcome to be New RFL, the sport's answer to the Wheeltappers and Shunters Social Club.
 
Posted
1 hour ago, gingerjon said:

I admire an 'approximately 732' far more than an 'approximately 730'.

I couldn't remember exactly but knew it wasn't a multiple of 10 😅

  • Haha 1
Posted
25 minutes ago, JohnM said:

You don't say! 😀😀

Was just checking it out as wasn't going to watch it with Las Vegas being on but not a good image for the team and sport.

Posted
23 minutes ago, EggFace said:

Was just checking it out as wasn't going to watch it with Las Vegas being on but not a good image for the team and sport.

What do you propose should be done about it? 

Posted

Hull KR is going to sell out again this week.

This is great, but it really does highlight how we need to expand the ground with some urgency. The club hasn’t won anything yet, so if we’re creating this much demand simply by playing well and getting in the Top 4 once, imagine what real success would bring? We don’t want to lose the opportunity to enable new customers to sample the product. At the moment we risk that. 

 

  • Like 4
Posted
2 hours ago, Worzel said:

Hull KR is going to sell out again this week.

This is great, but it really does highlight how we need to expand the ground with some urgency. The club hasn’t won anything yet, so if we’re creating this much demand simply by playing well and getting in the Top 4 once, imagine what real success would bring? We don’t want to lose the opportunity to enable new customers to sample the product. At the moment we risk that. 

 

You’d imagine as a bare minimum that they’d be looking at reducing the visitors allocation (bar Hull) if at all possible or maybe even moving them to the Well.

  • Like 1
Posted
17 hours ago, Eddie said:

What do you propose should be done about it? 

They need to have there own stadium 16,000 max but thats never going to happen.

Posted
47 minutes ago, Leyther_Matt said:

You’d imagine as a bare minimum that they’d be looking at reducing the visitors allocation (bar Hull) if at all possible or maybe even moving them to the Well.

Yes I think at the moment we've given 2 blocks of the North Stand to Warrington, so c800. Sometimes if the away team pre-sales aren't that high we reduce that and put more tickets on sale later in the week (the  away section is unreserved so we can just make it smaller). But what we really need is to extend the East Stand to the south end of the pitch, creating 1,000 or so extra standing tickets in the area of the ground most people want to be in. 

The other issue is hospitality. All the boxes are sold for the season, the main restaurant usually sells out and the cheaper 'Legends Lounge' restaurant memberships are also almost all gone. So we risk leaving a lot of money on the table (and hospitality buyers tend to be the pool of future sponsors so you want to get them in where you can). The "corporates" capacity is what drives Leeds and Catalans much greater revenues, and just as big a gap for us to bridge to sustain ourselves as a top-level club. 

Nice problem to have though. Certainly beats watching with 1,200 others in the rain against Barrow, on a postage-stamp- sized farmers field pitch crammed in the middle of both a dog track and a speedway track.  🤣🤣🤣

  • Like 2
Posted
2 hours ago, EggFace said:

They need to have there own stadium 16,000 max but thats never going to happen.

Exactly. 

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Eddie said:

Exactly. 

If Hull City got their way and were allowed to build a training "campus" on the land along Walton Street next door to the stadium, maybe a smaller ground could be built within that - just as Man City did at the Etihad - which FC could use for most matches and just hold derby games at the MKM. It would be ideal. 

But I really can't see the council backing down on the idea: Hull Fair has been held on that land for hundreds of years, it's the biggest in Europe and I can't see the council risking moving it to another site. 

  • Like 1
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.