JohnM Posted September 24, 2019 Posted September 24, 2019 Me too. The disciplinary panel every time. Bernard Manning lives! Welcome to be New RFL, the sport's answer to the Wheeltappers and Shunters Social Club.
Jao 711 Posted September 24, 2019 Posted September 24, 2019 13 hours ago, GUBRATS said: Absolute disgrace , just what defence could they have produced ? I think they just looked at the video.
Jao 711 Posted September 24, 2019 Posted September 24, 2019 12 hours ago, johnh1 said: It was an attack to the head whether international or not. The disciplinary said it was worthy of a penalty. That means it should have been an 8 point try as a minimum. But it was Wigan, so it was ok. You could word it another way, ie “But it was Wigan so it can’t be ok”.
Rupert Prince Posted September 24, 2019 Posted September 24, 2019 4 hours ago, WSRD said: We were stood right behind the goalpost’s and Clubb could have easily missed putting his elbow/arm to Jackson Hastings head just as Jackson Hastings did miss George Williams when Williams was scoring his try. The incident to my mind should have been penalised and contact with the head should have resulted in a penalty try, plus a sin bin ,based on the other similar incidents we see on a regular basis. Robert Hicks seemed to be more concerned with his microphone/earpiece etc than he was with the actual match itself. The match review panel are as inconsistent as ever and it is this inconsistency that gets the fans backs up. Hastings was nowhere near close to Williams.
WSRD Posted September 24, 2019 Posted September 24, 2019 27 minutes ago, Rupert Prince said: Hastings was nowhere near close to Williams. He landed at the side of Williams as Clubb could have in the Hastings non- penalty try.
Wolford6 Posted September 24, 2019 Posted September 24, 2019 I read the heading and assumed it was his transfer fee. Under Scrutiny by the Right-On Thought Police
Click Posted September 24, 2019 Posted September 24, 2019 6 minutes ago, WSRD said: He landed at the side of Williams as Clubb could have in the Hastings non- penalty try. It was completely different situations, Clubb was falling ontop of Hastings as he scored the try. Hastings was chasing after Williams and just slide in beside him when Williams scored. I am not sure how you can say they are the same.
Chris22 Posted September 24, 2019 Posted September 24, 2019 Whether it is intentional or not should be a mitigating or aggregating factor only, in my view. A lack of intent should not on its own mean there is no suspension.
LR23 Posted September 24, 2019 Posted September 24, 2019 I don't think he's the devil or that he should have been hung drawn and quartered but anyone who thinks that wasn't intentional only needs to look at the expression on his face. Even if he was trying to tackle him - what was he hoping to achieve by aiming for his back/head rather than the ball? He knew what he was doing and has got away with it. Lets draw a line under it but the RFL has obviously decreed that this is fair game now.
WSRD Posted September 24, 2019 Posted September 24, 2019 42 minutes ago, Click said: It was completely different situations, Clubb was falling ontop of Hastings as he scored the try. Hastings was chasing after Williams and just slide in beside him when Williams scored. I am not sure how you can say they are the same. I am not sure where you were sat but we were sat directly behind the sticks and Clubb could and should have done what Hastings did with the Williams try, Williams was in the process of scoring a try,Hastings was trying to stop him but slid along the side of Williams, and that is what Clubb could/should have done in my opinion. i have also watched the match on replay and as the MRP said it was a foul tackle but no penalty was given by the referee,which in my opinion was an error by the referee.
Click Posted September 24, 2019 Posted September 24, 2019 56 minutes ago, WSRD said: I am not sure where you were sat but we were sat directly behind the sticks and Clubb could and should have done what Hastings did with the Williams try, Williams was in the process of scoring a try,Hastings was trying to stop him but slid along the side of Williams, and that is what Clubb could/should have done in my opinion. i have also watched the match on replay and as the MRP said it was a foul tackle but no penalty was given by the referee,which in my opinion was an error by the referee. It may of been an error by the referee to not give a penalty, and that is all it would of been IMO. Again, the situations are completely different, Williams was running in to score from 20 metres out, whereas Hastings is basically falling over the line, with Clubb in tow. They're not running side-by-side for 20 metres before both falling to the ground. I understand how the Clubb incident looks, but it looked more like a lazy arm then an intentional forearm/elbow to the back of his head.
Gooleboy Posted September 24, 2019 Posted September 24, 2019 The MRP seem to come down heavier on certain Clubs / Players than others, especially from the Lower Divisions. It is the same with referee's, reluctant to send off SL players compared with the Championship and League 1.
Wellsy4HullFC Posted September 24, 2019 Posted September 24, 2019 9 hours ago, Harry Stottle said: FFS Wellsy that's a sweet one winging its way from from far east, and I am not siding with a fellow club fan, it is the arrogance and impertinence of that statement from you, whether you are right or wrong with the actions of Clubb just who do you think you are casting insults because someone has a different opinion than yours! That's exactly what you're doing. Had you not just been siding with a fellow club fan, you might have actually noticed his comment and pointed this criticism towards him first - it was he who first "cast insult" about glasses for having a different opinion to his. I simply returned the serve. You must have been wearing the same glasses
my missus Posted September 24, 2019 Posted September 24, 2019 unbelievable hatred for wigan again "the expression on his face" proves him guilty for godssake get a life. Through the fish-eyed lens of tear stained eyes I can barely define the shape of this moment in time(roger waters)
Hullfan Posted September 24, 2019 Posted September 24, 2019 19 hours ago, Wellsy4HullFC said: To be honest, I thought it looked accidental. Committed to stopping the try, tried to plant his hand on the floor to brace for impact but caught the player with his elbow in the process. Didn't look intentional at all to me. Totally agree with your post. The ones who don't have an agenda against Wigan. I for one hope Wigan win the gf. Uo the warriors
Old Frightful Posted September 25, 2019 Posted September 25, 2019 On 24/09/2019 at 06:27, JohnM said: someone watching on a 9 inch monochrome 405 line TV That would be great, I'd never have to take my black and white glasses off. On 24/09/2019 at 07:32, Jim Prendle said: Even if he takes those off, the fog of envy will still render his vision cloudy. I think it's descended on me, I don't seem to be able to make out Wellsy's sig. "You've only won one trophy SINCE 1985"
DC77 Posted September 25, 2019 Posted September 25, 2019 On 23/09/2019 at 23:06, Wellsy4HullFC said: To be honest, I thought it looked accidental. Committed to stopping the try, tried to plant his hand on the floor to brace for impact but caught the player with his elbow in the process. Didn't look intentional at all to me. Thought so too. He was falling so it was harder for him to have control.
Wellsy4HullFC Posted September 25, 2019 Posted September 25, 2019 8 hours ago, Old Frightful said: I think it's descended on me, I don't seem to be able to make out Wellsy's sig. ?
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.