Jump to content

shed load of players banned


Recommended Posts


someone at the disciplinary meeting seems to have got out of the wrong side of the bed, are we not short enough of playersūü§®

Through the fish-eyed lens of tear stained eyes
I can barely define the shape of this moment in time

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They only had a few matches to review so they really went to town on it. The RFL get worse every season, time for the clubs to act and get rid of the clowns.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Bod said:

They only had a few matches to review so they really went to town on it. The RFL get worse every season, time for the clubs to act and get rid of the clowns.

Nonsense ūüėāūüėā

Link to comment
Share on other sites

contrary:perversely inclined to disagree or to do the opposite of what is expected or desired.

so he disagreed with the ref but disagreed a bit more than makinson.

Through the fish-eyed lens of tear stained eyes
I can barely define the shape of this moment in time

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, my missus said:

rl disciplinary has been busy over the weekend.

https://www.rugby-league.com/article/35720/disciplinary-|-match-review-panel

hastings banned for what? greenwood banned.

Ha ha ha...

Hastings gets one match for other contrary behaviour.

How surprising that Makinson a player who has had a previous massive 5 game penalty, he gets sending off sufficient.

But Makinsons good fortune is he plays in the Cup Final next week!

What a complete and utter joke.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Rupert Prince said:

The game deserves all its getting.

A prestigious, high profile World Cup?

  • Like 1

Build a man a fire, and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. (Terry Pratchett)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Rupert Prince said:

Ha ha ha...

Hastings gets one match for other contrary behaviour.

How surprising that Makinson a player who has had a previous massive 5 game penalty, he gets sending off sufficient.

But Makinsons good fortune is he plays in the Cup Final next week!

What a complete and utter joke.

Makinson didn’t get SOS and both Hastings and Makinson’s incidents were very different. Try reading the minutes it may help you understand rather than post garbage

  • Like 4
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Spidey said:

Was Thompson banned for that tackle that didn’t even get a penalty in the game?

At the time I couldn't believe he wasn’t given a card red or yellow never mind no penalty. It makes me wonder how players who pick up band over 2 games aren't red carded. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, ELBOWSEYE said:

At the time I couldn't believe he wasn’t given a card red or yellow never mind no penalty. It makes me wonder how players who pick up band over 2 games aren't red carded. 

Because referees can't see everything and even sometimes make mistakes?

Honestly there's some embarrassing posts on here. Players do stuff wrong, they get banned. Nothing shocking here. 

But blaming the players for their actions seems to be a step too far.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, my missus said:

someone at the disciplinary meeting seems to have got out of the wrong side of the bed, are we not short enough of playersūü§®

It lists the 2 panel members for this week as being Jon Hamer & Adrian Morley

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Rupert Prince said:

Ha ha ha...

Hastings gets one match for other contrary behaviour.

How surprising that Makinson a player who has had a previous massive 5 game penalty, he gets sending off sufficient.

But Makinsons good fortune is he plays in the Cup Final next week!

What a complete and utter joke.

Yes you are a complete and utter joke !!!

Makinson got a caution for questioning an on-field decision by the Ref

Hastings got his ban for lifting up from the ground an injured player

Edited by Saint Toppy
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, M j M said:

Because referees can't see everything and even sometimes make mistakes?

Honestly there's some embarrassing posts on here. Players do stuff wrong, they get banned. Nothing shocking here. 

But blaming the players for their actions seems to be a step too far.

Not nine players in three games though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Saint Toppy said:

It lists the 2 panel members for this week as being Jon Hamer & Adrian Morley

Morley was commentating at the Wakefield game, funny he

never mentioned all these offences.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They're on a real loser on this one the disciplinary whether carrying on as normal when it isn't or applying sanctions and bans when we're so thin on the ground.

25 minutes ago, Bod said:

Morley was commentating at the Wakefield game, funny he

never mentioned all these offences.

I'm sure he mentioned this at Confession, if that help!

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Rupert Prince said:

Its been getting shambolic, the disciplinary have been getting ever more bizarre. 

The game deserves all its getting.

 

2 hours ago, Rupert Prince said:

Ha ha ha...

Hastings gets one match for other contrary behaviour.

How surprising that Makinson a player who has had a previous massive 5 game penalty, he gets sending off sufficient.

But Makinsons good fortune is he plays in the Cup Final next week!

What a complete and utter joke.

Make your mind up!

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Bod said:

They only had a few matches to review so they really went to town on it. The RFL get worse every season, time for the clubs to act and get rid of the clowns.

Put the clubs in charge of organising the disciplinary process? That would be entertaining!

  • Haha 1

"We are easily breakable, by illness or falling, or a million other ways of leaving this earthly life. We are just so much mashed potato."  Don Estelle

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Rupert Prince said:

Ha ha ha...

Hastings gets one match for other contrary behaviour.

How surprising that Makinson a player who has had a previous massive 5 game penalty, he gets sending off sufficient.

But Makinsons good fortune is he plays in the Cup Final next week!

What a complete and utter joke.

Makinson is very talented but to get sending off sufficient for an incident where he wasn't sent off is quite something.

  • Haha 3

Twitter: @TrylineUK
Latest Blog: The Play Off Pinnacle

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, M j M said:

Because referees can't see everything and even sometimes make mistakes?

Honestly there's some embarrassing posts on here. Players do stuff wrong, they get banned. Nothing shocking here. 

But blaming the players for their actions seems to be a step too far.

This was on sky with a video ref, the play was stopped. If you think my post is embarrassing you've got a low threshold. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Saint Toppy said:

Yes you are a complete and utter joke !!!

Makinson got a caution for questioning an on-field decision by the Ref

Hastings got his ban for lifting up from the ground an injured player

Hastings is a mind reader?

Did he kick him, elbow him, thump him? Was there any intent to hurt?

There is endless faffing around in the tackle.  

They have been many dubious tackles ignored or even penalised which then never go to disciplinary.  Their slide  rule criteria are bizarre.  So bazaar that they cannot come up with a coherent rule other than some catch all as a fig leaf to explain their lack of consistency. 

The logic for a ban for Makisnon is discipline and respect for the referee.  I do not see that normally though as a ban, or though possibly a yellow.  It's up to the ref.  So Makinsons should not have been before the tribunal, but I see no difference with Hastings.

It is a joke.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, M j M said:

Because referees can't see everything and even sometimes make mistakes?

Honestly there's some embarrassing posts on here. Players do stuff wrong, they get banned. Nothing shocking here. 

But blaming the players for their actions seems to be a step too far.

Even better when it's a rival player they should get a lot longer ban, but all my teams players are innocent. ūü§£

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Chris22 said:

Makinson is very talented but to get sending off sufficient for an incident where he wasn't sent off is quite something.

Yes.   Amazingly I phrased it badly.

I cannot believe that a mouthing off to the referee should go all the way up to the disiplinary but then just a caution.  If the ref got so annoyed he could give a yellow, which is plausible,then maybe one can see him at the tribunal.  

My point is he was called, but given sufficient.  However if all lifting in the tackle (assuming valid) and all the flops we see was a ban then there should have been 2 dozen at the tribunal.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...