Old Frightful Posted January 24, 2013 Posted January 24, 2013 Then he curled up on the turf like a girl. Or, to put it another way, like a professional footballer... Hull FC....The Sons of God.... (Well, we are about to be crucified on Good Friday)
Griff9of13 Posted January 24, 2013 Posted January 24, 2013 I find it sort of strange that on here there is outcry when and if a RU club poaches a single player from league but can be singing the praises of a club who only came into existence as a result of a WHOLE club being poached by a rival code. "it is a well known fact that those people who most want to rule people are, ipso facto, those least suited to do it."
gingerjon Posted January 24, 2013 Posted January 24, 2013 I find it sort of strange that on here there is outcry when and if a RU club poaches a single player from league but can be singing the praises of a club who only came into existence as a result of a WHOLE club being poached by a rival code. You'll get a twenty page thread demanding to know why a rugby union journalist is using the word 'rugby' but you won't find anyone ever wondering why a soccer writer can use 'football'. What's the F in RFL stand for? Build a man a fire, and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. (Terry Pratchett)
my missus Posted January 24, 2013 Posted January 24, 2013 suggs (madness) on bbc news this morning," what do you think suggs"? well for me he didn't kick him hard enough. . always liked suggs. Through the fish-eyed lens of tear stained eyes I can barely define the shape of this moment in time(roger waters)
Griff9of13 Posted January 24, 2013 Posted January 24, 2013 Come on, how long are we meant to go back? Besides, my main concern is the City of Bradford and the good this has done for this place is already incredible. Its not quite utopia but barriers are being broken simply from a good cup run....who knows we may even get the hole filled in one day. Sorry, I'm not really having a go at Bradford City and the people of Bradford, Christ knows, they could do with some good fortune . What I was trying to get at is that football (soccer) has done just as much, if not more, damage to our game over a long period of time yet no one is anywhere near as hostile to that game as they are to rugby union. I just really can't understand why. "it is a well known fact that those people who most want to rule people are, ipso facto, those least suited to do it."
WearyRhino Posted January 24, 2013 Posted January 24, 2013 Sorry, I'm not really having a go at Bradford City and the people of Bradford, Christ knows, they could do with some good fortune . What I was trying to get at is that football (soccer) has done just as much, if not more, damage to our game over a long period of time yet no one is anywhere near as hostile to that game as they are to rugby union. I just really can't understand why. Err, hang on. Not true. I despise soccer.
gingerjon Posted January 24, 2013 Posted January 24, 2013 Can't agree Griff. Soccer looked after itself and got on with developing their game. It wasn't their job to help RL but they didn't actively try to kill it. They never banned RL clubs from using their grounds nor ban players. Whereas RU did and more besides. No, soccer did more than just develop its own game. It went out of its way to restrict the growth of a new code of professional football, prevented the growth of the game outside the heartlands and actively sought the same spectators. It's misguided to believe soccer to be blameless and lay all of our ills on the door of rugby union. Of course, rugby league's biggest enemy was, and is, itself. Build a man a fire, and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. (Terry Pratchett)
Griff9of13 Posted January 24, 2013 Posted January 24, 2013 (edited) No, soccer did more than just develop its own game. It went out of its way to restrict the growth of a new code of professional football, prevented the growth of the game outside the heartlands and actively sought the same spectators. It's misguided to believe soccer to be blameless and lay all of our ills on the door of rugby union. Of course, rugby league's biggest enemy was, and is, itself. Can't argue with any of that. Like I said in my earlier post, soccer poached an entire club, Manningham to form Bradford City so as to try and establish itself as the dominant code in the city. This was far from an isolated example. The team I once played for, St Helens (Pilkinktons) Recs went the same way in 1902. Fortunately they only stuck to soccer for a couple of years and came back. Edited January 24, 2013 by Griff9of13 "it is a well known fact that those people who most want to rule people are, ipso facto, those least suited to do it."
longboard Posted January 24, 2013 Posted January 24, 2013 Sounds pretty bad. John, Phil Parkinson for the Huddersfield Town job?
gingerjon Posted January 24, 2013 Posted January 24, 2013 They didn't ban RL. They didn't have to. Soccer actively sought to convert rugby clubs and prevent association clubs from playing rugby. Build a man a fire, and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. (Terry Pratchett)
gingerjon Posted January 24, 2013 Posted January 24, 2013 As far as I know, no guns were held to heads or Vichy style collaboration occurred. If they switched it was because they voted to. That is true. But in terms of the spread of a professional working class sport which do you think might have had the greater impact? A few clubbable chaps not wanting to professionalise themselves - or another professional working class sport going all out to win exactly the same market of spectators. Build a man a fire, and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. (Terry Pratchett)
Futtocks Posted January 25, 2013 Posted January 25, 2013 Southampton FC bans reporters from talking to fans outside ground. Let me never fall into the vulgar mistake of dreaming that I am persecuted whenever I am contradicted. Ralph Waldo Emerson
gingerjon Posted January 25, 2013 Posted January 25, 2013 They were just taking advantage of the situation whereby the RU would rather rugby died out than be dominated by the oiks. Yes, they were. But rugby league needed paying spectators to survive and grow, and soccer did not sit back and idly wait to see which side the working class public was going to support. (Obviously they acted in their own interests and didn't ban anyone but to pretend that only rugby union has been harmful, or to downplay what losing the fight with soccer meant (and continues to mean) is to ignore a major factor in rugby league's development.) Build a man a fire, and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. (Terry Pratchett)
gingerjon Posted January 25, 2013 Posted January 25, 2013 There's some truth in that but you can't expect a rival anything to help the opposition. They were pro soccer not (generally) anti RL. Whereas RU wanted to kill the code (not an exaggeration imo) Certainly in the early days rugby union wanted to kill rugby league. After that, I think it was just pigheadedness and obstinacy. Soccerball also had a problem with potential pro/am schisms up until the 1920s. The FA Cup was originally a challenge tournament for the amateur classes; the Amateur Football Alliance wanted to usurp the FA as the true custodian of the game. Build a man a fire, and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. (Terry Pratchett)
gingerjon Posted January 25, 2013 Posted January 25, 2013 Anyway.....just seen the prices of the tickets for Citys allocation of 31852. £40 £56 £72 £90 and £100. Not cheap but I bet they all go. I'm sure they will. And nobody will complain about why it's not on the season ticket or that the kick off time means they'll miss Bullseye. Build a man a fire, and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. (Terry Pratchett)
Wolford6 Posted January 25, 2013 Posted January 25, 2013 And nobody will complain about why it's not on the season ticket or that the kick off time means they'll miss Bullseye. I'm going to complain because I'll probably have to look after my grandkids. The two girls have City shirts and the boy will support them just to spite me. Under Scrutiny by the Right-On Thought Police
Wolford6 Posted January 25, 2013 Posted January 25, 2013 Michael Chopra is a waste of talent and space. Under Scrutiny by the Right-On Thought Police
ArmchairRhino Posted January 26, 2013 Posted January 26, 2013 Luton aren't exactly Sutton but a non-league club beating a top flight club is still a big deal. Nice one. There's no dignity in plastic seats
gingerjon Posted January 26, 2013 Posted January 26, 2013 just to spite me Smart kids. Build a man a fire, and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. (Terry Pratchett)
JohnM Posted January 27, 2013 Posted January 27, 2013 You'll get a twenty page thread demanding to know why a rugby union journalist is using the word 'rugby' but you won't find anyone ever wondering why a soccer writer can use 'football'. What's the F in RFL stand for? Farce? Farrago? Farage?
1976PMJwires Posted January 27, 2013 Posted January 27, 2013 (edited) Great win for Leeds u today, gutted yido but a fantastic effort from Leeds Edited January 27, 2013 by 1976PMJwires
back to the future Posted January 27, 2013 Posted January 27, 2013 And now the RS are losing 3-1 against lowly Oldham Lovely
WearyRhino Posted January 27, 2013 Posted January 27, 2013 Great win for Leeds u today, gutted yido but a fantastic effort from Leeds I'm sure you'd like to think again change the offensive word.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now