Jump to content

RLWC Attendance-O-Meter


Recommended Posts


It's great we have the games on BBC, I enjoyed watching the game tonight cosy at home at no extra cost...

Saved me making any effort to go through  ticketing and travel.

I would have gone to the stadium otherwise...

It is a catch 22...

No matter the price I would still have watched from home. Unless it was england.

Of course I see benefits of BBC showing the games, but not sure about every single one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This won’t shock anyone but IMO the attendance figures are inflated.

Attendances figures aren’t head counts of course - they are sales figures - but I was at Ireland vs Lebanon on Sunday and there was absolutely no way on God’s Earth it was 6k+. Maybe 3-4K. 

But on the whole it’s a good World Cup and it’s only just getting started. Not writing it off as a failure by any means. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, redjonn said:

It's great we have the games on BBC, I enjoyed watching the game tonight cosy at home at no extra cost...

Saved me making any effort to go through  ticketing and travel.

I would have gone to the stadium otherwise...

It is a catch 22...

No matter the price I would still have watched from home. Unless it was england.

Of course I see benefits of BBC showing the games, but not sure about every single one.

I'm trying to think of the last World Cup (or equivalent tournament) in any sport that I'm aware of where every game was not available on TV/streaming.

I'm honestly not sure when that would be or what sport.

  • Like 3

Build a man a fire, and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. (Terry Pratchett)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last year after the postponement I was starting to have my doubts about the calibre of the WC leadership. I'm not feeling reassured with what's transpired during the event so far.

It seems the focus hasn't been on the fans or the players but maximising profit. Of course, profit has to be important but the balance between that and affordability has to be struck and in that the organisers failed. 

The BBC coverage has been excellent and the game will have got some new fans through that. It's a shame at that each world cup, there are organisational miscalculations that reduce the potential benefit the tournament can bring. 

My blog: https://rugbyl.blogspot.co.nz/

It takes wisdom to know when a discussion has run its course.

It takes reasonableness to end that discussion. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Big Picture said:

That makes the total after 16 matches 164,159 for an average of 10,259.

My figures don't quite match yours. Are there any corrections I need to make?

Eng - Sam 43,119 Round 1  
Aus – Fij 13,666    
Ton-PNG 10,409 Tot  
Ire – Jam 6,320 95,525  
Sco – Ita 6,206    
C Is– Wal 6,188 Avg  
NZ – Leb 5,435 11,941  
Fra – Gre 4,182    
       
Eng – Fra 23,638 Round 2 Accum
Aus- Sco 10,276    
Ton – Wal 7,752 Tot Tot
NZ – Jam 6,829 68,915 164,440
PNG – C Is 6,273    
Leb – Ire 6,057 Avg Avg
Sam – Gre 4,415 8,614 10,278
Fiji – Ita 3,675    

My blog: https://rugbyl.blogspot.co.nz/

It takes wisdom to know when a discussion has run its course.

It takes reasonableness to end that discussion. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, EssexRL said:

I have been thinking the same. I would imagine very very few people have travelled to the UK for games for the reasons you say (although you would think a few might have travelled from France). So we are relying on England fans and expats. Clearly as Tonga and Lebanon showed there is interest amongst those communities.

There were a few Greece and Samoan fans at Doncaster and lots of noisy PNG fans at Warrington tonight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, The Masked Poster said:

What people forget is that in 2013, pretty much most of the tournament was invisible to most people. And I went to loads of games then and loved it all. 

The TV coverage of 2013 is simply not on the same planet compared with today. Thems the facts. 

Absolutely. The BBC coverage - not just the actual matches but also the reporting & social media - is more than  anyone would reasonably expect.

And if charging higher prices means that the international game gets more funding than would otherwise have been the case - at the cost of more empty seats - then so be it.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Jim from Oz said:

TOTAL after week 1: 95,243 (11,905 per match)

Tonga v Wales: 7,753 

UPDATED TOTAL:  157,886 (average 10,525)


TARGETS:

2000 RLWC: 263,921

(8,514 per match)

 

2017 RLWC: 382,080

(13,646 per match)

 

2013 RLWC: 458,483

(16,374 per match)

 

2022 WOMEN’S EURO: 574,865

(18,544 per match)

 

ORIGINAL TARGET: 750,000

TOTAL FOR WEEK 1: 95,243 (average 11,905)

PNG v Cook Islands: 6,273

TOTAL FOR WEEK 2:  68,875 (average 8,609)

UPDATED TOTAL: 164,118 (average 10,257)

 

TARGETS:

2000 RLWC: 263,921

(8,514 per match)

 

2017 RLWC: 382,080

(13,646 per match)

 

2013 RLWC: 458,483

(16,374 per match)

 

2022 WOMEN’S EURO: 574,865

(18,544 per match)

 

ORIGINAL TARGET: 750,000

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, looking at the above figures, and presuming week 3 (I reckon about 50,000) will have less people than weeks 1 and 2 (a combined 164,118), if we get (my reasonably optimistic estimate of) 225,000 for the Q/Fs on, we are now tracking at a total attendance of 420,000.

That would be very disappointing. And while we are not looking (yet!) at the shocker that was the 2000 RLWC, we are tracking not much better than the underwhelming 2017 RLWC.

In fact, 2021(22) RLWC reminds me (from afar in Oz, admittedly) very much like 2017 RLWC in quite a few ways (crowds, lack of excitement/feel).

The two bright spots remain that 2021(22) RLWC is getting a great run on the BBC and should also make a good sum of $$$ for the IRL. 🤞

Plus, watching all the 2021(22) RLWC  games on Kayo streaming, I remain as enthusiastic for the RLWC in general as I ever have … in my (100% biased) mind it is the BEST sporting event on earth … I just wish we could pull it all together, organisation-wise ! 🙂

And thanks always to the players of all nations who provide such great entertainment, and all the fans and supporters who watch at the grounds or on TV.

Hopefully 2025 RLWC will finally realise the RLWC's potential !

Regards
Biased of Sydney
 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Many pages ago I asked the question (maybe could have been put more clearly of course) about fans tours. Certainly, in the case of krikit and union, there seems to be a significant numbers of fans who have travelled from their home countries on organised tours.

Such a tour to France in 2025 would appeal to me.

On attendances -something I've avoided commenting on, as it's the on-field action that concerns me - it's my view that free-to-air coverage cannibalises attendances. 

There is in my mind no doubt of the excellence quality and quantity of coverage by BBC Sport and this more than compensates for any possible reduction in numbers through the turnstiles.

As for the ticketing experience, clearly some have had real problems.  I've found it unduly complex but not problematic. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jim from Oz said:

So, looking at the above figures, and presuming week 3 (I reckon about 50,000) will have less people than weeks 1 and 2 (a combined 164,118), if we get (my reasonably optimistic estimate of) 225,000 for the Q/Fs on, we are now tracking at a total attendance of 420,000.

That would be very disappointing. And while we are not looking (yet!) at the shocker that was the 2000 RLWC, we are tracking not much better than the underwhelming 2017 RLWC.

In fact, 2021(22) RLWC reminds me (from afar in Oz, admittedly) very much like 2017 RLWC in quite a few ways (crowds, lack of excitement/feel).

The two bright spots remain that 2021(22) RLWC is getting a great run on the BBC and should also make a good sum of $$$ for the IRL. 🤞

Plus, watching all the 2021(22) RLWC  games on Kayo streaming, I remain as enthusiastic for the RLWC in general as I ever have … in my (100% biased) mind it is the BEST sporting event on earth … I just wish we could pull it all together, organisation-wise ! 🙂

And thanks always to the players of all nations who provide such great entertainment, and all the fans and supporters who watch at the grounds or on TV.

Hopefully 2025 RLWC will finally realise the RLWC's potential !

Regards
Biased of Sydney
 

Agreed, it feels very 2017 without some of the landmark results that 2017 offered on-field (so far), and generally less competitive games throughout the tournament. 

Biggest takeaway is that we have lots and lots of work to do before 2025, both on and off the field.

Prior to the tournament I made the comment that England winning might not be as important to the success of the tournament because we were looking at packed crowds and coverage across the tournament that would create most of the value moving forward. It's starting to look like a big England run to the final will be essential in maintaining interest and crowds throughout the rest of the tournament. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Jim from Oz said:

So, looking at the above figures, and presuming week 3 (I reckon about 50,000) will have less people than weeks 1 and 2 (a combined 164,118), if we get (my reasonably optimistic estimate of) 225,000 for the Q/Fs on, we are now tracking at a total attendance of 420,000.

That would be very disappointing. And while we are not looking (yet!) at the shocker that was the 2000 RLWC, we are tracking not much better than the underwhelming 2017 RLWC.

In fact, 2021(22) RLWC reminds me (from afar in Oz, admittedly) very much like 2017 RLWC in quite a few ways (crowds, lack of excitement/feel).

The two bright spots remain that 2021(22) RLWC is getting a great run on the BBC and should also make a good sum of $$$ for the IRL. 🤞

Plus, watching all the 2021(22) RLWC  games on Kayo streaming, I remain as enthusiastic for the RLWC in general as I ever have … in my (100% biased) mind it is the BEST sporting event on earth … I just wish we could pull it all together, organisation-wise ! 🙂

And thanks always to the players of all nations who provide such great entertainment, and all the fans and supporters who watch at the grounds or on TV.

Hopefully 2025 RLWC will finally realise the RLWC's potential !

Regards
Biased of Sydney
 

Plus the women's and wheelchair tournaments are only just about to get going and I reckon they're going to get some pretty positive coverage here in the UK too. 

We may not remember this tournament for packed stadiums (although let's see how it feels after the knockouts) but we'll certainly remember it as a magnificent festival of all that RL has to offer, with many millions in the UK having their first sustained engagement with the sport, via the BBC. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it was just prices putting people off then category D would be full at most of the games, which it clearly isn’t. 
 

The Hull QF for example has plenty of category D tickets left, £25 to see NZ v Fiji and some of the best players in the world doesn’t sound like much to me, in a RL mad city but there’ll probably be about 10-12k there.  
 

The impact of FTA coverage has been underestimated on this thread imho, plus the lack of fans from other countries and the fact that RL is a small regional sport covering an area of around 4-5m people. As a comparison if there was a football World Cup in Scotland with no away fans and all games on bbc they wouldn’t have packed stadiums either, there’d be much less than 6,000 at Falkirk for Honduras v South Korea. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Eddie said:

If it was just prices putting people off then category D would be full at most of the games, which it clearly isn’t. 
 

The Hull QF for example has plenty of category D tickets left, £25 to see NZ v Fiji and some of the best players in the world doesn’t sound like much to me, in a RL mad city but there’ll probably be about 10-12k there.  
 

The impact of FTA coverage has been underestimated on this thread imho, plus the lack of fans from other countries and the fact that RL is a small regional sport covering an area of around 4-5m people. As a comparison if there was a football World Cup in Scotland with no away fans and all games on bbc they wouldn’t have packed stadiums either, there’d be much less than 6,000 at Falkirk for Honduras v South Korea. 

It kind of goes with what I've been saying, yes some of the prices are a little bit high for the group games, but then you wouldn't expect many people to want to pay for a high class event experience at Samoa v Greece at Doncaster or Italy v Scotland at Kingston Park etc.

I think the fact that people ( RL fans mainly) can watch every game for free and thus not have to pay for games is a big factor.

I've been to 3 games so far and enjoyed every one of them in different ways.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I posted this on Facebook a couple of days ago but how many people who are talking about empty grounds and poor crowds have actually been to or are planning on going to games?

It seemed the majority of people commenting the most are making no attempt to even try and get to games.

Again, it says a lot I feel.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.