Jump to content

2025 Transfer Tracker


Recommended Posts


13 hours ago, GeordieSaint said:

Nothing official yet but…

 

Hopefully both true just what Saints need. If Hurrell retires also as rumoured another chance to add a bit of pace to the backline. 

Edited by bobbruce
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, bobbruce said:

Hopefully both true just what Saints need. If Hurrell retires also as rumoured another chance to add a bit of pace to the backline. 

Sailor was coming to Leigh until Reece Walsh got injured all sorted then Brisbane decided that they wouldn't let him leave, needed him as cover.

Leigh's definite loss, Saints gain.

Edited by Harry Stottle
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Harry Stottle said:

Sailor was coming to Leigh until Reece Walsh got injured all sorted then Brisbane decided that they wouldn't let him leave, needed him as cover.

Leigh's definite loss, Saints gain.

True, however all things happen for a reason and it allowed us to sign Armstrong instead 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Harry Stottle said:

Sailor was coming to Leigh until Reece Walsh got injured all sorted then Brisbane decided that they wouldn't let him leave, needed him as cover.

Leigh's definite loss, Saints gain.

I don’t know enough about either Armstrong or Sailor to say who’s got the better signing. I think they will both go well though as both are the type to do well in SL good players with something to prove. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, bobbruce said:

I don’t know enough about either Armstrong or Sailor to say who’s got the better signing. I think they will both go well though as both are the type to do well in SL good players with something to prove. 

For what Leigh specifically need(pace to finish and defend linebreaks, height for a kicking target), I think Armstrong is more suited. Sailor is probably more suited to what Saints need(pace and creativity to add more variety to their attack), so I think both clubs will believe they've got the right man.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, GeordieSaint said:

Nothing official yet but…

 

Lee Briers is by far the more important capture.

  • Like 4

"The history of the world is the history of the triumph of the heartless over the mindless." — Sir Humphrey Appleby.

"If someone doesn't value evidence, what evidence are you going to provide to prove that they should value it? If someone doesn't value logic, what logical argument could you provide to show the importance of logic?" — Sam Harris

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, bobbruce said:

I don’t know enough about either Armstrong or Sailor to say who’s got the better signing. I think they will both go well though as both are the type to do well in SL good players with something to prove. 

Personally, I would rate Armstrong the better player.  Neither has managed to crack a regular NRL spot but for me Armstrong looks the better player - Sailor has too many errors in him.

  • Thanks 1

"The history of the world is the history of the triumph of the heartless over the mindless." — Sir Humphrey Appleby.

"If someone doesn't value evidence, what evidence are you going to provide to prove that they should value it? If someone doesn't value logic, what logical argument could you provide to show the importance of logic?" — Sam Harris

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Dunbar said:

Lee Briers is by far the more important capture.

Yep. He’ll be massive for our attack in particular - with the right players! 

Edited by GeordieSaint
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Dunbar said:

Lee Briers is by far the more important capture.

And probably to take over from Wellens particularly if they don’t win the GF this season & start next season poorly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

                                                                  :kolobok_sad:   Hull FC....The Sons of God....  :kolobok_sad:
                                                                     (Well, we are about to be crucified on Good Friday)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Old Frightful said:

I'm not sure there's anything new in that article though? Yes, he probably will end up there, given the offer on the table, but journos in various publications are rinsing the story for as many articles as they can muster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, phiggins said:

I'm not sure there's anything new in that article though? Yes, he probably will end up there, given the offer on the table, but journos in various publications are rinsing the story for as many articles as they can muster.

Have you any idea what the offer is, more or less than Asiata's £660,000 over 3 years?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Harry Stottle said:

Have you any idea what the offer is, more or less than Asiata's £660,000 over 3 years?

I think the general consensus is that it is more than Asiata's contract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, phiggins said:

I think the general consensus is that it is more than Asiata's contract.

That being so puts his Mr Lam in a quite difficult position, as his club's coach he should want to keep him and get the club to legally challenge the contract that is claimed to allow him to go to other SL clubs if they are confident it to be in their favour or get a recompense in the manner of a transfer fee for him.

As his dad he should want what his best for his sons financial future if Leigh  either can't or choose not to match the offer.

But can't blame Lam junior if he thinks that he could not attract a better NRL contract over three years - if that is the offered contract duration - for taking it if offered.

Initially I thought if he wants out of Leigh let him go now, but giving it some thought, I doubt the dressing room will feel bad towards him if he can get that kind of money and security.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Harry Stottle said:

That being so puts his Mr Lam in a quite difficult position, as his club's coach he should want to keep him and get the club to legally challenge the contract that is claimed to allow him to go to other SL clubs if they are confident it to be in their favour or get a recompense in the manner of a transfer fee for him.

As his dad he should want what his best for his sons financial future if Leigh  either can't or choose not to match the offer.

But can't blame Lam junior if he thinks that he could not attract a better NRL contract over three years - if that is the offered contract duration - for taking it if offered.

Initially I thought if he wants out of Leigh let him go now, but giving it some thought, I doubt the dressing room will feel bad towards him if he can get that kind of money and security.

I think Lam Snr is 'officially' staying out of it, and leaving it to Chester. Though he will no doubt be giving his son some advice. Whether that's listened to or not is another matter.

Not sure how such a dispute can arise. It's either down in writing that he can only talk to NRL clubs for next year, or it isn't. If they've put a clause in with a verbal agreement that he will only talk to NRL clubs, then that is incredibly naive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, phiggins said:

I think Lam Snr is 'officially' staying out of it, and leaving it to Chester. Though he will no doubt be giving his son some advice. Whether that's listened to or not is another matter.

Not sure how such a dispute can arise. It's either down in writing that he can only talk to NRL clubs for next year, or it isn't. If they've put a clause in with a verbal agreement that he will only talk to NRL clubs, then that is incredibly naive.

Maybe the naivity comes with misguided trust, "he is the coaches son, he won't go to any other club in this country" as long as his dad is here!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Harry Stottle said:

Maybe the naivity comes with misguided trust, "he is the coaches son, he won't go to any other club in this country" as long as his dad is here!

That would be an odd approach for the club to take though, as when Lachlan signed that contract, Adrian was only contracted to the end of this year anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I personally think that something should be said in relation to this saga.

Its now beginning to grow a head of its own..Someone from the club needs to disclose the position  they are at.

Once this has been done then rumours and conjecture will really slow down.

The Asiata saga was a little regrettable and it flat footed leigh.Lets not make the same mistake with Lachkam Lam.

 

 

If the lad is unhappy and wants a piece of the action same as Asiata then let him go. However if his contract says he can only go to an NRL team then also fine  ,but just put this matter to bed.

We are being plundered like a Spanish Galleon off the coast of Tortuga. I say let's go looking at players from clubs we can plunder..

 

Everyone has a price.Everyone ...

 

Come on Derek this is your domain splash the cash and demonstrate what top super league clubs do..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.