Jump to content

Football


Recommended Posts

Just now, Gerrumonside ref said:

I agree with your opinion here.

Will be interesting to see if/how Burnley respond in the transfer market this month to try and replace him.

You would think they would have someone in mind despite the more limited choice this window. 

Absolutely, I'm usually of the view that you don't get rid of a player unless you have a replacement in mind. Cornet's signing in Summer could be a signal for where the "new Burnley" is going.

If they don't replace him, they will find it hard not to go down imo.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


37 minutes ago, Tommygilf said:

Absolutely, I'm usually of the view that you don't get rid of a player unless you have a replacement in mind. Cornet's signing in Summer could be a signal for where the "new Burnley" is going.

If they don't replace him, they will find it hard not to go down imo.

Cornet’s signing from Lyon was an interesting move for them and him.  He’s shown a real eye for goal too for a midfielder in the Premier League and adapted quickly (which I always think is the sign of a good player).

The Dwight McNeil situation is interesting too as he’s not really kicked on this year in the league (0 goals, 1 assist) and is on a relatively new and big contract to 2024.  

I would imagine the Clarets will get a lot less for him than hoped a couple of years ago in a fire-sale and obviously need those assists from him this year if they’re to stay up.

Edit: Should say wingback/midfielder/forward haha

Edited by Gerrumonside ref
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ive always been into Football and Rugby, attendances and grounds and a few threads recently have got me really looking into crowds, in particular a discussion today with @gingerjon. It is fairly clear that there certainly wasn't the huge gulf that we now see, in practically every way from crowds to money, and it really shows the explosion in Football post Hillsborough, Italia 90 and with the Premier League. No doubt the decline in hooliganism played a big part too.

Here's one random weekend from 1988 with the supposed football mad Newcastle only getting 16k and RL towns like Oldham only getting 5k and Huddersfield less than 3k in Divison 2:

FB_IMG_1642444395578.jpg.1523e26a3d174dfc1610ce2bc0ff9cba.jpg

https://www.facebook.com/groups/844940199360108/permalink/1283625198824937/

Here's another from 1982 with Everton only getting 14k with Chelsea getting a sub 7k crowd in the old division 2 and Leeds getting sub 9k:

FB_IMG_1642444506060.jpg.a3a4ff5c89b111a225a562c9909eaf42.jpg

https://www.facebook.com/groups/844940199360108/permalink/1280992892421501/

Some of the crowds seem unbelievable in this day and age.

Edited by Damien
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Damien said:

Then there is this in 1987 4 x 4 digit crowds in the old 1st division and not a single crowd past 16k. Yes some small teams but remarkable all the same:

FB_IMG_1642445245554.jpg.ebe36c80d60292aa4ee463134a256800.jpg

https://www.facebook.com/groups/844940199360108/permalink/1279217445932379/

Linked to this is how far from the polite mainstream football was - beyond the televised big games like the FA Cup final (only one semi final was televised live and then not always).

I'm fairly certain that England getting to the semi final of the World Cup didn't even make the front page of the tabloid press as it wasn't considered proper news - even by the red top understanding of the word.

(England's games at Wembley were often sparsely attended too.)

  • Like 1

Build a man a fire, and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. (Terry Pratchett)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Football fandom was certainly more of a sub-culture back then.

What certainly sticks out now is how much older the average spectator is and of course the gentrification of the crowd.

Worth mentioning the impact the rave scene was about to have around that time on a lot of football heads.

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, gingerjon said:

Linked to this is how far from the polite mainstream football was - beyond the televised big games like the FA Cup final (only one semi final was televised live and then not always).

I'm fairly certain that England getting to the semi final of the World Cup didn't even make the front page of the tabloid press as it wasn't considered proper news - even by the red top understanding of the word.

(England's games at Wembley were often sparsely attended too.)

Indeed and football fans were demonised by politicians too (being polite there not to be political) and treated like a sub class of society.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Damien said:

Indeed and football fans were demonised by politicians too (being polite there not to be political) and treated like a sub class of society.

Yes. I wrote a lot more about that but decided to delete it as this isn't the politics board.

But very much so.

  • Like 2

Build a man a fire, and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. (Terry Pratchett)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Damien said:

Ive always been into Football and Rugby, attendances and grounds and a few threads recently have got me really looking into crowds, in particular a discussion today with @gingerjon. It is fairly clear that there certainly wasn't the huge gulf that we now see, in practically every way from crowds to money, and it really shows the explosion in Football post Hillsborough, Italia 90 and with the Premier League.

The year that Liverpool won the league and Widnes won the league in the late 70s, there was an "It's a knockout" type event with the players from both squads taking part, I think as part of a joint testimonial. Unimaginable that something like that would happen today, such is the gulf. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 17/01/2022 at 18:53, Damien said:

Then there is this in 1987 4 x 4 digit crowds in the old 1st division and not a single crowd past 16k. Yes some small teams but remarkable all the same:

FB_IMG_1642445245554.jpg.ebe36c80d60292aa4ee463134a256800.jpg

https://www.facebook.com/groups/844940199360108/permalink/1279217445932379/

The Leeds/Shrews match isn’t there a nought missing from behind the 13. Then it’d be the official attendance of 130,760. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great win for the Tics last night, they started off slowly but got more into the game as time went on. Max Power causes all sorts of problems with his throw ins. I can’t see anyone stopping them from winning the league now. 
Doncaster are doomed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Damien said:

Indeed and football fans were demonised by politicians too (being polite there not to be political) and treated like a sub class of society.

Many behaved like animals at that time 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, GUBRATS said:

Many behaved like animals at that time 

DNFTT

Build a man a fire, and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. (Terry Pratchett)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, GUBRATS said:

SOIDWIW

I didn't know you could speak Welsh

Build a man a fire, and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. (Terry Pratchett)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 18/01/2022 at 09:51, Damien said:

Indeed and football fans were demonised by politicians too (being polite there not to be political) and treated like a sub class of society.

Indeed, and plenty of people revelled in the sub culture status too that evolved during that time. 

To become accepted though football had to get gentrified to a large extent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, Tommygilf said:

Indeed, and plenty of people revelled in the sub culture status too that evolved during that time. 

Most of the people who claim to miss the culture of the game at the time were noticeable by their absence either through age or just not actually going to games.

There's a lot I don't like about football now but treating people who turn up to games like human beings is significantly better than being routinely caged like animals.

Build a man a fire, and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. (Terry Pratchett)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, gingerjon said:

Most of the people who claim to miss the culture of the game at the time were noticeable by their absence either through age or just not actually going to games.

There's a lot I don't like about football now but treating people who turn up to games like human beings is significantly better than being routinely caged like animals.

Still happens to Leeds fans away sadly, as recently as last month at Chelsea.

It was a sub-culture within a subculture in some ways.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Moderate ambition to have a cover photo on a football programme achieved ... although I'm pleased they tagged me to let me know as I'd forgotten taking that one

Bild

  • Like 1

Build a man a fire, and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. (Terry Pratchett)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...