Monkeymagic22 Posted October 16 Posted October 16 Personally I’d prefer that we sign younger Championship players, rather than having loads of injury prone ex SL players. Probably cheaper as well. We don’t want another Nathan Massey. 1
Rovers fev Posted October 16 Author Posted October 16 We’re not linked with McShane, we’ve signed will jubb from York 3
Eternal Rover Posted October 16 Posted October 16 4 minutes ago, Fevrover said: McShane is 34 do we really need him? Be interesting what fans think. I believe its Will Jubb of York we're linked with as McShanes arrival pushes jubb down their pecking order. 1
Eternal Rover Posted October 16 Posted October 16 On 10/10/2024 at 20:57, lingaro said: Olpherts no thanks I agree, his defence is dire. Yes he's scored tries this year but he's been playing for the league leaders who's squad is markedly stronger than all other championship teams. Not a wise choice for my money. 2
The Phantom Horseman Posted October 16 Posted October 16 21 minutes ago, Fevrover said: McShane is 34 do we really need him? Be interesting what fans think. Think TRL/LE missed a trick with their clickbait, they could have gone with "Featherstone Rovers set for boost in pivotal position as Nathan Cleary is spotted at the SL Grand Final". 3 2 "I won’t engage in a debate because the above is correct and if anything else is stated to the contrary it’s incorrect."
Gooleboy Posted October 16 Posted October 16 Mc Shane to York, Jubb to Rovers. A good signing for me if it comes off., he always shows up well against us. 1
lingaro Posted October 16 Posted October 16 3 hours ago, Eternal Rover said: I agree, his defence is dire. Yes he's scored tries this year but he's been playing for the league leaders who's squad is markedly stronger than all other championship teams. Not a wise choice for my money. He runs around like a headless chicken in defence. 1
Simon Hall Posted October 16 Posted October 16 1 hour ago, Gooleboy said: Mc Shane to York, Jubb to Rovers. A good signing for me if it comes off., he always shows up well against us. Jubby shows up well against everyone, I'm sad to see him leave. Been a major part of the club for quite a few years but probably the right time for him to have a go somewhere else. 3 http://www.alldesignandprint.co.uk Printing & Graphic Design with Nationwide Service Programmes | Leaflets | Cards | Banners & Flags | Letterheads | Tickets | Magazines | Folders | Brand Identity plus much more Official Matchday Programme Print & Design Partner to York City Knights, Heworth ARLFC, York Acorn RLFC & Hunslet RLFC Official Player Sponsor of Marcus Stock for the 2020 Season
marklaspalmas Posted October 16 Posted October 16 (edited) I've edited the headline as it is misleading Edited October 16 by marklaspalmas https://www.fevarchive.co.uk/
sentoffagain2 Posted October 16 Posted October 16 Oliver Holmes is a decent forward 32 years old so it goes against what i said about not signing older ex SL players.But he always struck me as a player who gets involved and has the pace to score tries. He should have 3 years left as a Championship player.We may already have one similar in Brads Day.
POR Posted October 16 Posted October 16 1 hour ago, sentoffagain2 said: Oliver Holmes is a decent forward 32 years old so it goes against what i said about not signing older ex SL players.But he always struck me as a player who gets involved and has the pace to score tries. He should have 3 years left as a Championship player.We may already have one similar in Brads Day. He's signed for Hull next year 1
sentoffagain2 Posted October 16 Posted October 16 30 minutes ago, POR said: He's signed for Hull next year Saw him on the released list if he can get a good contract at Hull FC good luck to him.
Tubby Posted October 17 Posted October 17 17 hours ago, Simon Hall said: Jubby shows up well against everyone, I'm sad to see him leave. Been a major part of the club for quite a few years but probably the right time for him to have a go somewhere else. Always a danger when a player is settled at aclub for years, he might never quite get to the same level for a new club.
POR Posted October 18 Posted October 18 Guess what !!!!!! Stay tuned in the coming days as we announce some exciting signings for our 2025 squad.
POR Posted October 18 Posted October 18 11 minutes ago, haskey said: Is that a fact or a promise POR You tell me h it's from a FEV post thanking Charlie Harris and Harry Bowes on leaving but what made me laugh is some exciting signings
The Phantom Horseman Posted October 18 Posted October 18 4 hours ago, POR said: what made me laugh is some exciting signings Don't understand this, why did that make you laugh? What are they supposed to put? 1 "I won’t engage in a debate because the above is correct and if anything else is stated to the contrary it’s incorrect."
POR Posted October 18 Posted October 18 1 minute ago, The Phantom Horseman said: Don't understand this, why did that make you laugh? What are they supposed to put? Because it implies that signings that may follow will not be as exciting personally I would have posted Stay tuned in the coming days as we announce some new signings for our 2025 squad.
The Phantom Horseman Posted October 18 Posted October 18 2 minutes ago, POR said: Because it implies that signings that may follow will not be as exciting Not sure how you've derived that from "Stay tuned in the coming days as we announce some exciting signings for our 2025 squad", but fair enough. 1 "I won’t engage in a debate because the above is correct and if anything else is stated to the contrary it’s incorrect."
POR Posted October 18 Posted October 18 31 minutes ago, The Phantom Horseman said: Not sure how you've derived that from "Stay tuned in the coming days as we announce some exciting signings for our 2025 squad", but fair enough. I just thought it was silly mentioning exciting because excitement is in the eyes of the beholder a new signing may excite you but may not float my boat so I think telling us they are soon to be announcing new signings would be better letting us all make our own minds up if they are exciting or not 3
Monkeymagic22 Posted October 18 Posted October 18 6 minutes ago, POR said: I just thought it was silly mentioning exciting because excitement is in the eyes of the beholder a new signing may excite you but may not float my boat so I think telling us they are soon to be announcing new signings would be better letting us all make our own minds up if they are exciting or not Doesn’t the word ‘Exciting’ make the statement stand out at bit more?. Personally can’t see anything wrong with its use. 2
The Phantom Horseman Posted October 18 Posted October 18 4 minutes ago, Monkeymagic22 said: Doesn’t the word ‘Exciting’ make the statement stand out at bit more?. Personally can’t see anything wrong with its use. I agree, nothing wrong with the club showing a bit of enthusiasm about its new recruits. I think that wording's fine, whereas if they announce something like a "major signing" then it really needs to be of some significance and one that will attract attention. 5 "I won’t engage in a debate because the above is correct and if anything else is stated to the contrary it’s incorrect."
Fevrover Posted October 18 Posted October 18 1 hour ago, Monkeymagic22 said: Doesn’t the word ‘Exciting’ make the statement stand out at bit more?. Personally can’t see anything wrong with its use. Nor me. 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now