Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 12/07/23 in all areas

  1. You know what he means Tommy, no need to be so facetious. If Championship/L1 clubs go to the wall no matter how big or small they are that is the focal point of the sport vanishing from the town, it won't happen immediately but the community game in those towns will be effected in due course because of it, all the lads who graduate to academies don't come from cities/towns who run academies, being a Leeds fan you should be well aware of that. @tec is quite right, reducing funding to clubs such as Haven is cause for grave concern, but the likes of Leneghan who suggested a couple or three years ago (and I recall that you have concurred on occasion) that all the earned funding should be directed to SL, is either the words of someone who can't see the woods for the trees and envisage what the consequences could be, or someone who has no feeling whatsoever for the game as a whole just so long as "I'm alright Jack".
    13 points
  2. With the greatest of respect, I'd suggest that comments about clubs outside SL 'having a misplaced sense of importance' is symptomatic of the 'I'm alright Jack' mentality in our sport and that has contributed to a huge split in the game and loss of community......and that's exactly why the game is in the situation it's in.
    10 points
  3. The poster did'nt suggest they did.But you knew that and still could'nt resist the sarcastic comment.
    9 points
  4. And your point is? The reality is, without clubs outside SL, many talented young players would not get the opportunity to play and would be lost to the game. It's really no more complicated than that.
    8 points
  5. Toulouse Barrow Halifax Keighley Swinton Bradford York
    7 points
  6. When Leigh were in the 'no man's land' of the Championship in the licencing years the club endeavoured to keep the interest of the young un's going by offering 3 free under 16's season tickets to every full season ticket holder, lots of those kids populated the junior sections of the community clubs in the town, if the pro club wasn't there doing that and no matter at what the level the pro player's where at who were idols for those kids I doubt that as many would have taken up the sport but found some other game/pastime to get involved with, take clubs out of towns and you are removing the initial interest in the sport, and those kids in the heavy woollens won't be wearing RL shirts of any description.
    7 points
  7. It's the Iam alright Jack attitude imo and he's not the only one.
    7 points
  8. A bit of nostalgia here. I remember getting this in the Hotspur comic as a kid.
    6 points
  9. One point which I don't think has been made is there's too many clubs in the championship. It was increased to 14 when it should have stayed at 12. This also damaged league 1. It means some clubs in the championship struggle with funding (especially with the pitiful central funding) and are also terrified of dropping into league 1 where they get no funding and only 9 home games a season!
    5 points
  10. Wow. That comment sums up exactly what's wrong with our game.
    5 points
  11. And the vast majority are released and would be lost to the game if there wasn't any RL outside of SL. Tyler Dupree is a prime example when, ahead of his England debut, he publicly stated that if it wasn't for the opportunity to play at Oldham he would simply have left the game.
    5 points
  12. Well ,although I'm obviously disappointed that he's going home, I'm grateful to have had the opportunity to watch him perform. He's been a breath of fresh air and brought some real talent. I'm sure he'll continue to perform to his best for the rest of the season and he'll leave with the best wishes from everyone at the club.
    5 points
  13. This seems a negative thread. The reality for most Championship 1 clubs that don’t own their ground is they need a backer. The figures shown for the unpaid wages indicate the average wage depending on the squad size to be c£250/300 per week even with a backer. To put your body on the line against full time players and to have to travel for hours on a coach, this is not a lot., My 17 year old has taken on a part time summer job and will be earning close to the lower of the above figures for making Ice cream The main issue the club face long term is either too high wages which can be dismissed, or too little income. Cutting wages leads to poorer results and lower crowds. Increasing income requires investment in facilities or the squad. Even if carried out the extra support may not equate to the win bonuses. i don’t believe you can run a championship team on gates of under 1000 without the backer but as we have seen relying on the backer is dangerous. I don’t think Whitehaven have done anything wrong and are right to try and avoid relegation, especially with fewer home matches being the result along with lower central funding and minimal away support. Overall I would challenge those saying the club are badly run to draw up a successful business plan that results in the club making a profit and sustainable growth. I have no idea of the answer as to how many clubs have a significant backer and would be in trouble without their financial input throughout the three divisions but I guess it is at best a significant minority We cannot as a sport afford to lose Cumbria. There would be nowhere else in the UK that could replace it,
    5 points
  14. If Bradford use more than 99 players, will they go to 3 digits or reuse squad numbers for those who weren't as good as they thought?
    4 points
  15. I'm a bit late to the party on discussion of the latest presentation and gradings and that generally the discussion has moved on on another thread to specific gradings for clubs but just thought I'd add my thoughts. I'm disappointed about a lack of weighting for Champ and League 1 clubs. Also I am disappointed by the quite blunt scoring with regards to fandom and facilities in particular. For example the viewership seems a bit ridiculous. I assume 0 points if not on TV then either 0.75 or 1 points depending on numbers. I'd like to see more range of possible points in attendance and the facilities. And I'm not particularly impressed by the all or nothing on stadium. For me there is little incentive for gradually improving your attendance/facilities etc incrementally to improve your score. This, along with a lack of weighting on attendances, leads to a higher likelihood of a closed shop.
    4 points
  16. Why do the RFL say "familiar face" as if anyone has ever heard of him?
    4 points
  17. I think that Barrow might be a tricky match for Fev. Decent team on their day.
    3 points
  18. Moaning about the colour clarity of a comic from the 60’s. Rugby League fans are undefeated.
    3 points
  19. It’s certainly sounds like it will be a revamped BP, I’m not happy with that and I imagine a lot more Town fans won’t be either.
    3 points
  20. SATURDAY 15th JULY Toulouse Olympique v Batley Bulldogs Toulouse by 28 SUNDAY 16th JULY Barrow Raiders v Featherstone Rovers Fev by 14 Halifax Panthers v Newcastle Thunder Fax by 22 Keighley Cougars v Widnes Vikings Draw Swinton Lions v London Broncos Swinton by 6 Whitehaven v Bradford Bulls Haven by 4 York Knights v Sheffield Eagles York by 10
    3 points
  21. Business!!! Really??? If it is business, how many clubs in SL would be in "business" if it wasn't for a sugar daddy pumping (in some cases £M's per season) in to them? How many clubs do you think would be sustainable business' if it wasn't for wealthy owners pumping money in and willing to write it off? How many club owners do you think will see a return on their investment? How many teams broke even, never mind made a profit? Wakefield was the only one, wasn't it???? All this rehashed "Framing the future" proposal is about, is trying to ensure the clubs at the top get a bigger slice of the pie, in the hope that the sugar daddy's won't have to pump as much money in, and to try to make the clubs more sustainable, because they cannot afford to keep throwing money away like they have done for years. The problem with that dream is, it won't mean the sugar daddy's at the top don't spend as much, or clubs becoming more sustainable. The basic problem is, most clubs are spending more than they are making, the same as it was when SL started. It would seem nothing has changed in that regard, other than weakening the teams outside of SL and widening the gap between the have's and have not's.
    3 points
  22. Australia, NZ and England should be fully funding themselves. That is $60k that could be much better spent on growing the game in developing countries.
    3 points
  23. two fantastic matches this w/e, valk v rhinos then knights v eagles , both too close to call
    3 points
  24. The IRL gives $20k a year to Full members including Australia, NZ and England. Why the hell would they need that? Use the money they do have wisely. We see results when money is used wisely. Look at Jamaica. The only nation in all the Americas with a paid RL employee. We can see the direct results of that.
    3 points
  25. I was reading a 'Ask me anything' with a union 7's coach on Reddit. It seems that outside of the top 20 nations union basically has the same feeling towards World Rugby as we do towards the IRL. I would suggest focusing on nations outside the top 20 union nations. At the moment their rankings look like this: Ireland France New Zealand South Africa Scotland England Australia Argentina Wales Japan Georgia Samoa Fiji Italy Tonga Portugal Uruguay United States Romania Spain The next 20 teams look like this: Namibia Chile Canada Hong Kong Russian Federation Netherlands Switzerland Brazil Belgium Korea Zimbabwe Germany Kenya Poland Czech Republic Ukraine Colombia Tunisia Sweden Paraguay The nations in bold have some rugby league going on. The IRL isn't making any money as it is. Sew your seeds where they are actually going to grow.
    3 points
  26. Surprisingly nobody has said it yet so i'll stick my head above the parapet - Cumbrian Franchise !!! I've said it numerous times on here over the years that I dont think any of the current Cumbrian clubs will ever be in a strong enough position to play at the top level again. Between the 3 Championship clubs and the numerous amateur clubs the county has a very long and extreemly strong history with RL and for me its the ideal area for the RFL to be targetting as an 'expansion' towards having another SL side. Whether the fans of Workington & Whitehaven would ever come together to support some form of North Cumbria franchise is another matter, but in terms of a future SL team i'd love to see a strong franchise team from Cumbria before one from places like Newcastle, Midlands, France etc.
    3 points
  27. I'm glad you posted this as I was about to comment with regards Sheffield and the fact that without the Eagles the fledgling junior set ups wouldnt even be fledgling and that seeps further south than here too (not sure quite how far south you could say though). Its great sitting here saying Cumbria would survive without Haven but how true is that really? how much does having Haven mean that the community game up there is strong. without being there and seeing the interaction I think it is very hard to judge how much you could lose quite a chunk of Cumbria with that one loss, and the knock on to that could be the end of Workington and the rest of Cumbria.. I agree with you about places like the heavy woollen district where the SL is right there but in other areas, those outpost areas, how much is it dependent on the semi pro teams being there as a focal point... we can speculate but only those involved up there could really tell us. Any club going bust is a loss to the game, how big a loss and what that impact is is hard to tell until it happens sadly.
    3 points
  28. I have to say looking at the comments on this thread there seems to be a split between the fans of SL clubs and the leagues below them.
    3 points
  29. May the best team win,shame this isn't the final.
    3 points
  30. great to see such travelling support , the more the merrier, enjoy the day it should be a cracking game
    3 points
  31. Well even better and as Mr Unicorn says there's nothing like a sunny day anThe bod ad a run of wins to tempt long lost townies back. The BOD have worked wonders this season with events sponsors and trying to keep the stadium and its facilities in use for far more that this leagues 9 home gates would normally bring. This is not lost on the local populous who are desperate to have a feel good factor in these difficult economic times. The decision to offer entry for a fiver to boost the crowd for the ladies match is to be applauded by us all. Once again well done bod and volunteers for your hard work and glad the results are been seen by community support through the gates and over the bars I am sure. UTT
    3 points
  32. Tbf it’s not just Whitehaven, while I accept SL clubs are under no obligation to help anyone but themselves, if they do nothing to help the semi pro divisions or community game it won’t help super league in the long run.
    3 points
  33. As Dave suggests Cumbria county council was abolished, as were the district councils - all being replaced with unitary authorities (Cumberland and Westmoreland & Furness) which now provide all council services. So no Cumbria County Council any more, but Cumbria is still the ceremonial and shrieval county and the police and fire authority. As far as it relates to the situation in Yorkshire - Cumbria is now akin to the situation in any of N Yorks, W Yorks, S Yorks or the E Riding. But Yorkshire as a whole doesn't have any administrative or ceremonial role at present - it is just the traditional/historic county providing a cultural link between the various parts (N, E, S & W).
    2 points
  34. In the usual characteristic Big City entitled immodesty, defeat here will feel like the Visigoths sacking Rome in 410 for some Reds. It would seem the play off march had been thwarted. Civilisation collapsed. The Orcs ascended, led by a Leopard head wearing Chieftain. Personally with the "Yorkshire Super League" at the table's basement and Solly's attainment of the seemingly 20 points of safety, it feels structure overshadows scores. Fund raising achieved, council loan gained, co ownership built on, Foundation flourishing, Stadium to be sorted, attendances arising, revenue streams expanding and debt being resolved. Unlike Rome, this "Empire" is going from rust and iron to gold. So anything good on field seems like a bonus with the necessary job done. Leythers have already sold 1000. I am looking forward to this. Whether I do afterwards is another matter
    2 points
  35. Correct, also Keighley used to be white with a red and green vee. But to get this in a national comic at the time was a big deal for rugby league supporting kids.
    2 points
  36. in all honesty i think youve already got better
    2 points
  37. No point in a merger, all that you end up with is just one team with about the same fan base and so what about all the talent produced up there? Nothing would change, SL teams would still just come in and cherry pick the best talent so it's not like you would end up with a stronger team.
    2 points
  38. It's not just internationals, I take quite a few people to the challenge cup final every year, including many who don't have rugby league as their first sport. I can never tell them when next year's game is
    2 points
  39. Two struggling clubs in the same little borough that would rather die than cooperate. With their resources they could be be comfortable in the Championship, washing their faces and giving the local kids an opportunity to carve out careers in RL "WHAT???........Save them "jam eaters"? I would rather stick needles in my eyes than watch that lot" " OVER MY DEAD BODY"
    2 points
  40. You say that they don't have to walk that tightrope, but it seems to me that the tightrope in question is semi-pro rugby league. If they aren't walking this tightrope, they don't exist. There may be things they can do to increase income, but their outgoings seem to just cover what is necessary to run as a middle of the road championship club. Spend less and there's a big risk of being in L1, where there are increased travel costs, less central funding and only 9 home league matches to gain match day income - potentially leaving them in a worse position even if able to reduce player payments, etc. Which of our semi-pro clubs (without a benefactor) are in a significantly better position, where a bad season or two wouldn't result in financial problems? What risk (tightrope) are you suggesting they can step back from and still continue to operate?
    2 points
  41. 2 points
  42. And power, don't forget that.
    2 points
  43. The risk-reward trade off in signing players from down under is really quite difficult and good recruiters in this country really have to earn their money. If you sign a young-ish player, you run the risk that they will be straight back as soon as an NRL contract comes up, and if it is an experienced player (or one with a young family) you have to hope they are coming with the right attitude and ensure they get the right support to settle in properly. At least in this case Clifford is going at the end of the season so Hull have time to plan what happens next, versus a Josh McGuire type shambles. The likes of Rhyse Martin and Kane Linnett are absolute gold dust.
    2 points
  44. Wouldn't want to argue with that. I think that if Day is fit and can be included in the side as well as Butty, the way in which their time on the pitch is managed will be instrumental in deciding how we cope with the challenges to come. Both of them are highly effective at acting half back, but both have different ways of keeping up and building momentum. Properly used they are a potentially powerful combination for keeping the opposition guessing and on the back foot.
    2 points
  45. Apologies that I haven't been following this thread closely. But I have to say that Sky should see Rugby League/Super League as a valuable asset. Looking at the Sky Sports channels tonight, it is absolute dross. The Main Event is Sky Sports News (news as the Main Event!), then there is Premier League and Football League repeats on the two Soccer channels, repeats of F1, Ryder Cup golf, Women's cricket, and the Rugby Championship and then a documentary on Kobe Bryant. If they think that serving up not a single piece of live sporting action is quality then they are absolutely clueless. They need more action, not less.
    2 points
  46. I'm personally pretty torn on international RL. On one hand I want to buy tickets to all of the three Tonga Tests, drag as many people along as possible and help the series be a resounding success, showing there is life in international RL that isn't all about the usual suspects. On the other hand. I just can't really be arsed.
    2 points
  47. Went to watch the Knights in the 1895 final two years ago at Wembley, the last time York were at Wembley was in 1931, I thought I would never see my team at Wembley, I'd had a heart operation on the previous Wednesday, nothing was going to stop me being there, I'm 75 and so glad I made it.
    2 points
  48. Lack of central funding has played a big part in this, and I’m sure it’s causing issues at other clubs too. Haven’s directors have publicly stated that their central funding has dropped from £160,000 last year to just £40,000 this year. That shortfall of £120,000 is a big hole to fill for a club at this level.
    2 points
  49. An Ashes series would only get big crowds in Britain. In the media in Oz the PI nations have more credibility than GB as a team due to the profile of their players. Reality is the only long term solution is for GB to be competitive, which seems as long away now as it has in the past 40 years. If GB beat Australia you'd see the pom-bashing hatred return. Right now its more of a sympathetic or sneering view that GB isn't worth bothering about.
    2 points
  50. From a town fan it would be extremely sad for Cumbrian rugby league if Whitehaven ceased to exist. I don’t know the ins and outs of the club but one of their players has posted on Facebook asking for people to donate to the fund set up and stating the players are owed 1 months salary which amounts to 35k based on 2 wins and 2 losses. This apparently doesn’t cover any other costs such as doctors, coach or medical equipment just the players wages. He also states they haven’t had a recognised physio since April. None of that sounds good and I would think some drastic restructuring is needed for them to continue. Town had a similar cash flow problem last year, cut salaries by a third last year and got rid of out of county players. No doubt the wage structure this year would be even less given we are in league 1 and central funding at that level is very little. Yesterday we had a squad where 19 out of the 21 are Cumbrian, a lot were playing in the community game last year, have just had a substantial sponsorship for ground naming, started a ladies team, had numerous community takeover days by local clubs, and achieved an attendance of 1395 for yesterdays game against Rochdale. It will take time to produce a team capable of sustaining championship rugby but it will be done within the amount of money we have to spend. Things can be turned around but I think there’ll have to be some serious thinking about how they move forward.
    2 points
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.