Jump to content

Sat 4th Nov: Third Test: England v Tonga KO 2.30pm @ Headingley (BBC One)


Who will win?  

57 members have voted

  1. 1. Who will win?

    • England by 13 points or more
      18
    • England by 7 to 12 points
      21
    • England by 1 to 6 points
      7
    • Tonga by 1 to 6 points
      5
    • Tonga by 7 to 12 points
      5
    • Tonga by 13 points or more
      1

This poll is closed to new votes

  • Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.
  • Poll closed on 04/11/23 at 15:00

Recommended Posts


Just now, usain bolt said:

I'd predict welsby stays at 1, and currie or Bateman fill the centre hole. 

I was just going to say the same thing. Obviously Wardle and Farnworth are unavailable. Are Newman, King, Wardle and Farnworth our only centres?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Going against the grain here and think Tonga will turn it on and put a stack of points on the poms.  Bit like 2018 v the Kiwis. That game also played in Leeds. 

15+ result. 

(I'm sure I'll hear about it if I'm wrong 😛)

  • Like 3

The Rugby League Fan's Mantra for helping the game grow internationally is ten two-letter words - IF IT IS TO BE, IT IS UP TO ME.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, The Partisan said:

Going against the grain here and think Tonga will turn it on and put a stack of points on the poms.  Bit like 2018 v the Kiwis. That game also played in Leeds. 

15+ result. 

(I'm sure I'll hear about it if I'm wrong 😛)

I was thinking about that game and wondering if we will see the same kind of turnaround. 

But I don't think so for a few reasons. 

With Williams back and the animosity that Wane has tried to build up, I think England will be motivated to win 3-0.

The Tongan's have lost Fonua-Blake.  Without Taumalolo, he is their talisman this series and the only forward who has caused the English defence trouble restricting yards.  Without him, I think the Tongan's will feel down and less motivated. 

Finally, the Tongan's just aren't good enough to run up a stack of points against a good defence. 

Edited by Dunbar

"The history of the world is the history of the triumph of the heartless over the mindless." — Sir Humphrey Appleby.

"If someone doesn't value evidence, what evidence are you going to provide to prove that they should value it? If someone doesn't value logic, what logical argument could you provide to show the importance of logic?" — Sam Harris

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really interested to see how the Williams - Smith pairing works. It’s our best halfback pairing IMO. Throw Welsby into the mix as well; quite exciting.

Shame either Radley or Knowles aren’t playing as we could have had a full spine with Clark at hooker (who has been excellent this series). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, GeordieSaint said:

Really interested to see how the Williams - Smith pairing works. It’s our best halfback pairing IMO. Throw Welsby into the mix as well; quite exciting.

Shame either Radley or Knowles aren’t playing as we could have had a full spine with Clark at hooker (who has been excellent this series). 

Still wonder what could have been if Wane had picked Clark for the World Cup. Yes his form wasn't the best last season but considering the lack of alternatives it was well worth still going with him.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Damien said:

Still wonder what could have been if Wane had picked Clark for the World Cup. Yes his form wasn't the best last season but considering the lack of alternatives it was well worth still going with him.

Better than MickyMac, but Clark isn't from Wigan.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Damien said:

Still wonder what could have been if Wane had picked Clark for the World Cup. Yes his form wasn't the best last season but considering the lack of alternatives it was well worth still going with him.

We’d have still been knocked out by Samoa in the semis 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, DavidM said:

We’d have still been knocked out by Samoa in the semis 

It was a one point golden point loss.  That's a result that could have swung the other way without a lot of variables going England's way.

And I think McIllorum at 9 with no specialist hooker on the bench was one of the variables that went against England.

  • Like 3

"The history of the world is the history of the triumph of the heartless over the mindless." — Sir Humphrey Appleby.

"If someone doesn't value evidence, what evidence are you going to provide to prove that they should value it? If someone doesn't value logic, what logical argument could you provide to show the importance of logic?" — Sam Harris

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DavidM said:

We’d have still been knocked out by Samoa in the semis 

Maybe. On our day, we are a better team than Samoa as Newcastle showed and next year will show us, and, as we are showing, Tonga. What caught us out, in my opinion, was that we had peaked too early, and couldn’t sustain it. Samoa are not as strong, but had a lot of full time players from the Australian competition, which is a good standard. 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Dunbar said:

It was a one point golden point loss.  That's a result that could have swung the other way without a lot of variables going England's way.

And I think McIllorum at 9 with no specialist hooker on the bench was one of the variables that went against England.

Yet oddly, we played better when Radley moved to 9, then it all went to pot again when McIllorum was sent back on

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Exiled Wiganer said:

Maybe. On our day, we are a better team than Samoa as Newcastle showed and next year will show us, and, as we are showing, Tonga. What caught us out, in my opinion, was that we had peaked too early, and couldn’t sustain it. Samoa are not as strong, but had a lot of full time players from the Australian competition, which is a good standard. 

What  caught us out was choking in a semi final , you could see it from very early on .  I can’t see one player changing that . We had a team out there who smashed Samoa . But a player who isn’t playing in a team is always the one who would have made a difference 

Edited by DavidM
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, phiggins said:

Yet oddly, we played better when Radley moved to 9, then it all went to pot again when McIllorum was sent back on

Which probably backs up the argument that Clark would have been a better pick for England in the WC than McIllorum. 

Personally, I am a huge fan of Clark and I think he has been comfortably the best 9 in England after Roby for a long time.  He definitely should have been in the WC team but that is water near a bridge now (as Kramer would say).

Edited by Dunbar
  • Like 1

"The history of the world is the history of the triumph of the heartless over the mindless." — Sir Humphrey Appleby.

"If someone doesn't value evidence, what evidence are you going to provide to prove that they should value it? If someone doesn't value logic, what logical argument could you provide to show the importance of logic?" — Sam Harris

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 01/11/2023 at 18:54, bobbruce said:

I expect a bit of niggle in this game and Tongas discipline to go. With that I think England could run away with it.  

Think Wayne will have the team well wound up again to make it a clean sweep over Tonga, never seen him so wound up after last week's game, love the passion.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Chrispmartha said:

Ben Currie at centre Mulhern at loose.

Based on what he has available, that seems fair.

Currie has good size and mobility so useful to counter the big Tongan edge forwards and centres.

And I am glad Mulhern has got a start rather than Smithies coming in and getting the 13 jersey.

  • Like 1

"The history of the world is the history of the triumph of the heartless over the mindless." — Sir Humphrey Appleby.

"If someone doesn't value evidence, what evidence are you going to provide to prove that they should value it? If someone doesn't value logic, what logical argument could you provide to show the importance of logic?" — Sam Harris

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.