daz39 Posted September 16 Author Share Posted September 16 15 minutes ago, Odsal Outlaw said: Good news in some respects, but also feels a bit of an admission of defeat that its seen as a success to be leaving a good stadium because you can’t attract enough fans. As i've explained previously it isn't a good stadium for us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gooleboy Posted September 16 Share Posted September 16 21 minutes ago, daz39 said: As i've explained previously it isn't a good stadium for us. I have to agree, it is one of the most unattractive, soulless stadiums I have ever been to. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Championi Posted September 16 Share Posted September 16 Fantastic news I've been saying it for ages Daz it will make a massive difference. A claret and gold Ken Davey stadium. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eddie Posted September 17 Share Posted September 17 7 hours ago, daz39 said: 12k is the minimum requirement for SL. it Would look, sound and feel a damn sight better than the place were in now. I didn’t show there was a minimum (as Trailfinders def didn’t hold 12k) so fair enough then, and agreed it would. Do you think it would boost attendances then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Odsal Outlaw Posted September 17 Share Posted September 17 7 hours ago, daz39 said: As i've explained previously it isn't a good stadium for us. Yes but based on low turnout? I’ve been to a few RL games there when it’s a packed house and it’s a fantastic place to watch RL, one of which I think is the record attendance of any sport played there (RLWC vs Ireland) 1 Nottingham Outlaws Rugby League Harry Jepson Winners 2008 RLC Midlands Premier Champions 2006 & 2008 East Midlands Challenge Cup Winners 2005, 2006, 2007 & 2008 Rotterdam International 9's Cup Winners 2005 RLC North Midlands Champions 2003 & 2004 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommygilf Posted September 17 Share Posted September 17 10 minutes ago, Odsal Outlaw said: Yes but based on low turnout? I’ve been to a few RL games there when it’s a packed house and it’s a fantastic place to watch RL, one of which I think is the record attendance of any sport played there (RLWC vs Ireland) Huddersfield had a bit of a mini boom around a decade ago, but even then their stadium wasn't half full. Atmosphere does suffer as a result and the matchday experience likewise. The IMG criteria even recognise whilst that having a good quality venue is important, having an appropriately sized one is also worth consideration too. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Worzel Posted September 17 Share Posted September 17 8 hours ago, daz39 said: 12k is the minimum requirement for SL. it Would look, sound and feel a damn sight better than the place were in now. Can’t be true: Hull KR’s ground isn’t 12k and hasn’t been since we got into Super League. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dboy Posted September 17 Share Posted September 17 9 hours ago, Agbrigg said: Well first of all he would need a plot of land, then a large pot of money even small 10k stadiums cost a fair bit these days. Could be years before things happen, however I do agree it's definitely needed. Wakey's single new stand (and some aspects of the ground refurb), cost £12m. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eddie Posted September 17 Share Posted September 17 1 hour ago, Worzel said: Can’t be true: Hull KR’s ground isn’t 12k and hasn’t been since we got into Super League. The Jungle doesn’t hold 12k either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Les Tonks Sidestep Posted September 17 Share Posted September 17 (edited) 10 hours ago, daz39 said: 12k is the minimum requirement for SL. it Would look, sound and feel a damn sight better than the place were in now. 2 hours ago, Eddie said: I didn’t show there was a minimum (as Trailfinders def didn’t hold 12k) so fair enough then, and agreed it would. Do you think it would boost attendances then? 1 hour ago, Worzel said: Can’t be true: Hull KR’s ground isn’t 12k and hasn’t been since we got into Super League. 32 minutes ago, Eddie said: The Jungle doesn’t hold 12k either. The minimum requirement is actually 5000. That's the height of the bar set in the new IMG era...... On a side note, I'd suggest it a good idea for many on here to go and read the "handbook'. Edited September 17 by Les Tonks Sidestep 3 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Griff Posted September 17 Share Posted September 17 9 hours ago, Championi said: Fantastic news I've been saying it for ages Daz it will make a massive difference. A claret and gold Ken Davey stadium. It'll be interesting to see whether crowds increase. "We'll sell you a seat .... but you'll only need the edge of it!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sheddingswasus Posted September 17 Share Posted September 17 I wonder if they still own Fartown? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gingerjon Posted September 17 Share Posted September 17 21 minutes ago, Les Tonks Sidestep said: The minimum requirement is actually 5000. That's the height of the bar set in the new IMG era...... To be fair, that was the bar as set during the '8s' period when the RFL decided to both reduce standards and lower the requirement to enforce standards. Build a man a fire, and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. (Terry Pratchett) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Les Tonks Sidestep Posted September 17 Share Posted September 17 (edited) 7 minutes ago, gingerjon said: To be fair, that was the bar as set during the '8s' period when the RFL decided to both reduce standards and lower the requirement to enforce standards. I thought one of the ideas behind IMG was supposed to be to drive up standards? It's also, again, worth pointing out that some of the headline stadium minimum standards aren't actually the minimum required, so for example higher standards are applied to Wakefield's ground than say Cas'. Edited September 17 by Les Tonks Sidestep Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gingerjon Posted September 17 Share Posted September 17 1 minute ago, Les Tonks Sidestep said: We're supposed to be in a period of driving up standards We are. But, again, the minimum ground standards are RFL determined and enforced. The IMG grading assumes you've met them. Build a man a fire, and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. (Terry Pratchett) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Les Tonks Sidestep Posted September 17 Share Posted September 17 Just now, gingerjon said: We are. But, again, the minimum ground standards are RFL determined and enforced. The IMG grading assumes you've met them. Except they have never been enforced......and they still won't be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daz39 Posted September 17 Author Share Posted September 17 3 hours ago, Eddie said: I didn’t show there was a minimum (as Trailfinders def didn’t hold 12k) so fair enough then, and agreed it would. Do you think it would boost attendances then? Yes, a lot of people i know of have stopped coming because of the experience of being in that stadium on game days. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daz39 Posted September 17 Author Share Posted September 17 2 hours ago, Odsal Outlaw said: Yes but based on low turnout? I’ve been to a few RL games there when it’s a packed house and it’s a fantastic place to watch RL, one of which I think is the record attendance of any sport played there (RLWC vs Ireland) Indeed, unfortunately we won't ever get crowds anywhere near the level to make it fantastic, even with 10,000 in in the past it's still been pretty awful sight wise, there is also nothing apart from the bit out front where we can utilise to make the game day experience any better. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daz39 Posted September 17 Author Share Posted September 17 22 minutes ago, sheddingswasus said: I wonder if they still own Fartown? No, the fields are council owned and the old paviliion and the land it sits on is privately owned and is currently being built on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sentoffagain2 Posted September 17 Share Posted September 17 12 hours ago, ATLANTISMAN said: Can Fartown be redeveloped That was mt first thought. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henson Park Old Firm Posted September 17 Share Posted September 17 48 minutes ago, daz39 said: No, the fields are council owned and the old paviliion and the land it sits on is privately owned and is currently being built on. Any photos? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chrispmartha Posted September 17 Share Posted September 17 54 minutes ago, daz39 said: Indeed, unfortunately we won't ever get crowds anywhere near the level to make it fantastic, even with 10,000 in in the past it's still been pretty awful sight wise, there is also nothing apart from the bit out front where we can utilise to make the game day experience any better. I like the John Smiths stadium (is it still called that?) but it's just not suited to the Giants and is a millstone around their necks. I hope KD can get this built, I give Huddersfield some stick sometimes but I think if they can get a 12,000 purpose built stadium that they can utilise properly it will help push them forward, they do need to push on on the field to help this though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilderspoolmemories Posted September 17 Share Posted September 17 Personally I have always found the Huddersfield fans really nice people, there just are not enough of them! I think a 12,000 capacity stadium with both seating and standing areas would be good for them. A smaller stadium would certainly help create more of an atmosphere. Planning needs to be considered carefully. The current stadium only really has one way in and out, and traffic to and from the stadium on a matchday is a bit of a nightmare. Maybe consider somewhere a bit closer to the motorway too, though not so far out of town that the home fans who walk or use public transport for games can't get there. And call it Fartown! 2 2009 Warrington 25 Hudderfield 16 2010 Warrington 30 Leeds 6 2011 League Leaders Shield Winners 2012 Warrington 35 Leeds 18 Challenge cups and league leaders shields everywhere! We need more silver polish! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrIzzard Posted September 17 Share Posted September 17 2 hours ago, dboy said: Wakey's single new stand (and some aspects of the ground refurb), cost £12m. Pocket change for Ken one of the smartest buissness men in Yorkshire who happens to love RL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dboy Posted September 17 Share Posted September 17 24 minutes ago, MrIzzard said: Pocket change for Ken one of the smartest buissness men in Yorkshire who happens to love RL. The £2m a year he already writes off on the Giants is hardly "pocket change". If ever there are tangible stadium plans, it won't being funded out of his own pocket. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now