Jump to content

1-3 Mar: The Betfred Championship Match Thread


Recommended Posts


  • Replies 214
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Just now, snapski said:

All the hacks saying it’s as busy as they can remember. Fiddling.

It's the council who look after that kind of thing rather than the club, but I would have guessed around the 7500 - 8000 mark.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

spitting, absolutely a red, disgusting 

"Freedom without socialism is privilege and injustice, socialism without freedom is slavery and brutality" - Mikhail Bakunin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dewsbury absolutely robbed there. Had a try chalked off early in the game that should have stood, then Toronto awarded a try that was clearly held up. Plus Lussick with a shoulder charge to the head that wasn’t even penalised. 

I’m not prejudiced, I hate everybody equally

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Lamport Life said:

Definitely not a try but those are the breaks when there is no VR.

Wolfpack are playing without much discipline; look too much like the teams of previous years and not enough like the more disciplined team of this year.

Ridiculous decision. His hand just landed on the ball. He had no idea where the ball actually was and no way did he put any downward pressure on it. He could just have likely hit the ball with his head.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, JonM said:

Crowd at Widnes given as 5782 - have to say I would have guessed a couple of thousand more than that - two packed stands.

South Stand was nowhere near full. Probably about 50%. North Stand (4,000 seats) was sold out but they’re not allowed to sell them all for safety reasons as its unallocated seating. Couple of hundred from Fev, 5,800 will be about right.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, scotchy1 said:

Annakin not only stupid for spitting (which is obviously stupid and will see a big ban) but you are 5 points down, 5 mins to go and you are in the opponents redzone with tackles in the bag, why are even squaring up to defenders and getting in the defensive line. You're begging to get the officials involved. Get back in position and try and contribute to getting over the line

Wonder how much the fact he's not a Dewsbury player made him put the big I am before his team?  Pathetic, whatever the reason.

This world was never meant for one as beautiful as me.
 
 
Wakefield Trinity RLFC
2012 - 2014 "The wasted years"

2013, 2014 & 2015 Official Magic Weekend "Whipping Boys"

2017 - The year the dream disappeared under Grix's left foot.

2018 - The FinniChezz Bromance 

2019 - The Return of the Prodigal Son

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, GeordieSaint said:

Was the Dewsbury first try grounded properly? Couldn’t tell...

It was not so it evens out.

And the supposed second try for Dewsbury in the first half was not a try, either.

Neither team can blame the ref in this game, IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good defence from Dewsbury. Their hard work deserved something out of the game. Thought the conditions made for an interesting game. Toronto seem to have problems when they play on heavy pitches, remember Barrow last season? Were Dewsbury right kicking all those penalties, should they have risk going for a try or two or was the Toronto defence too strong? Overall an enjoyable game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dreadful weather at Odsal, but quite an absorbing game to watch. Toulouse came to do a job and did it to the letter. They kicked the Bulls back into their own twenty all game and ran better lines in attack. The Bulls huffed and puffed but lacked a coordinated game plan ... no-one taking charge of the tactics and no offload game up  front. Half a dozen individuals had good games but we need better support play.

No complaints from me... or I suspect, from the majority of Bulls fans.

Under Scrutiny by the Right-On Thought Police

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Wakefield Ram said:

Was at the Dewsbury game, so didn't know why he was sent off. Stupid thing to do but lengthy ban really? A lot less dangerous than some of Toronto's headshots.

If it was spitting I think that's normally 6 games isn't it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Wakefield Ram said:

Was at the Dewsbury game, so didn't know why he was sent off. Stupid thing to do but lengthy ban really? A lot less dangerous than some of Toronto's headshots.

Spitting is classed as a grade E or F offence. Grade E carries a 4-8 game ban and Grade F is an 8+ game ban, so unless he can find some sort of conclusive proof that he didn't do it, which is going to be very tough, he is indeed facing a lengthy ban - the touch judge was in no doubt and recommended a red card without the ref even asking him what penalty it merited.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, The Phantom Horseman said:

Spitting is classed as a grade E or F offence. Grade E carries a 4-8 game ban and Grade F is an 8+ game ban, so unless he can find some sort of conclusive proof that he didn't do it, which is going to be very tough, he is indeed facing a lengthy ban - the touch judge was in no doubt and recommended a red card without the ref even asking him what penalty it merited.

Which illustrates the strange standards that apply. Head shots are far more dangerous than spitting however disgusting it is. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.