Jump to content

Fri 11th Nov: RLWC SF: Australia v New Zealand KO 19:45


Who will win?  

85 members have voted

  1. 1. Who will win?

    • Australia by 13 points or more
      35
    • Australia by 7 to 12 points
      24
    • Australia by 1 to 6 points
      3
    • New Zealand by 1 to 6 points
      14
    • New Zealand by 7 to 12 points
      8
    • New Zealand by 13 points or more
      1

This poll is closed to new votes

  • Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.
  • Poll closed on 11/11/22 at 20:15

Recommended Posts


  • Replies 840
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

The only position on the park the Aussies have a genuine edge of their NZ counterparts is left centre. The rest of the positions are toss a coin over who’s a better player…

… really hope the Kiwis turn up. I expect they will and it’ll be an absolute hummdinger of a game.

Posted

I think the Aussies will take it reasonably comfortably. I just don’t think you can turn good form on like a tap and for all the hype, I’ve yet to be impressed with the Kiwis. There’s no doubt they’ve got great players and on a piece of paper, you could make a case for them challenging the Aussies in a number of positions and maybe they’re better in a few but I just can’t see it on the field.

Australia by 18

Posted

Couple of key variables here.

One, New Zealand haven't played as well as the sum of their parts yet.  I think we all know/think they can play better.  Is this the game?

Two, Australia have looked very slick but they have had it their own way in the middle of the park so their halves/backs have been able to play on the front foot.  The Kiwi middles be a whole different ball game for them.

I am expecting a very tight game.

"The history of the world is the history of the triumph of the heartless over the mindless." — Sir Humphrey Appleby.

"If someone doesn't value evidence, what evidence are you going to provide to prove that they should value it? If someone doesn't value logic, what logical argument could you provide to show the importance of logic?" — Sam Harris

Posted
4 hours ago, GeordieSaint said:

The only position on the park the Aussies have a genuine edge of their NZ counterparts is left centre. The rest of the positions are toss a coin over who’s a better player…

… really hope the Kiwis turn up. I expect they will and it’ll be an absolute hummdinger of a game.

Hmmm, NZ have a better forward pack but tbh id take the entire Aus spine over NZs. 

Posted

The Kangaroos have four top games every five, the Kiwis one or two. The former are more consistent but if the Kiwis produce what they are capable of, who knows? 

My blog: https://rugbyl.blogspot.co.nz/

It takes wisdom to know when a discussion has run its course.

It takes reasonableness to end that discussion. 

 

Posted
3 hours ago, Balmainboy said:

Hmmm, NZ have a better forward pack but tbh id take the entire Aus spine over NZs. 


It could be argued that NZ have a more powerful forward pack but I think Australia has a more creative one, with Murray, Yeo & Crichton & the big boys should be able to hold the kiwis power forwards, they’ve arguably got bigger motors 

Posted

Oz 28-10

NZ look less than the sum of their parts due to questionable coaching and seem overly reliant on big plays from individuals in Hughes and Manu.

Posted

Aussies of course. And unfortunately.

Rugby Union the only game in the world were the spectators handle the ball more than the players.

Posted

If NZ can get it together, there is no doubt they are capable of winning this one.

The sober head says Oz by 10 however.

Posted

The ARLC strike again. An Aussie ref will adjudicate over the Kiwis v Kangaroos when there are very reputable and capable English referees to ref it. How can we not get some neutrality in these situations 

Posted

The kiwis are predictably unpredictable in which they can just pull a win out of nowhere and this World Cup sem-final against Australia is Taylor made for them.

Posted
4 hours ago, StandOffHalf said:

Oz 28-10

NZ look less than the sum of their parts due to questionable coaching and seem overly reliant on big plays from individuals in Hughes and Manu.

Spot on, unfortunately. Unless the Kiwis have been in cruise mode waiting for this game, they've been pretty underwhelming. They still have it in them to rise for a one-off game against the Kangaroos, but they seem to have no structure or flow to their attack at all. 

Posted

Madge needs to be sent to the glue factory if he picks Jesse Bromwich, I'm holding out hope that he might finally miss out as he didn't return after his first stint on the weekend. 

Strange that Seb Kris never got a chance in the centres during the pool games, CNK has been struggling out at centre, even DWZ might be a better option at this point.

For all the hype around Manu this tournament at fullback (and it is deserved) he really does kill too many links to the outside backs and definitely overplays his hand a touch, skills that he would develop with extended time in the position. Hopefully Leota and Niukore are back in the frame for them as well. 

Australia is an interesting one, we haven't really faced a decent side yet as the Fijians were very depleted and underdone in the first pool match. More importantly we haven't had to compete against quality forwards that would take it to our pack as the weakest point in the side, interesting to see how the challenge NZ will present there impacts the backline.

Posted
1 hour ago, Iceberg Slim said:

The ARLC strike again. An Aussie ref will adjudicate over the Kiwis v Kangaroos when there are very reputable and capable English referees to ref it. How can we not get some neutrality in these situations 

Remind me please who refereed Eng v PNG?

Posted
3 minutes ago, Sports Prophet said:

Remind me please who refereed Eng v PNG?

Don’t know but why can’t they pick neutral refs when they are available based on the matchup. NZ v Aus = English ref. What’s difficult about that?

Posted
16 minutes ago, Sports Prophet said:

Remind me please who refereed Eng v PNG?

English fans are just as critical of the decision to use an English ref for England games as we are for using Australian referees for Australia. 

"The history of the world is the history of the triumph of the heartless over the mindless." — Sir Humphrey Appleby.

"If someone doesn't value evidence, what evidence are you going to provide to prove that they should value it? If someone doesn't value logic, what logical argument could you provide to show the importance of logic?" — Sam Harris

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.