Phil Posted March 17 Posted March 17 News just coming through that Calderdale council have accepted Ken Davy’s offer for The Shay 8 "Freedom without socialism is privilege and injustice, socialism without freedom is slavery and brutality" - Mikhail Bakunin
The Blues Ox Posted March 17 Posted March 17 (edited) 16 minutes ago, Phil said: News just coming through that Calderdale council have accepted Ken Davy’s offer for The Shay And without Halifax Town having confirmation that they will be eligable for promotion to the EFL having 3 teams playing in the same stadium. They have sleepwalked in to a possible disaster. A community group now has 6 weeks to register a bid which could delay the sale for 6 months but its really only delaying the inevitable. Edited March 17 by The Blues Ox 1
Phil Posted March 17 Author Posted March 17 6 minutes ago, The Blues Ox said: And without Halifax Town having confirmation that they will be eligable for promotion to the EFL having 3 teams playing in the same stadium. They have sleepwalked in to a possible disaster. A community group now has 6 weeks to register a bid which could delay the sale for 6 months but its really only delaying the enevitable. I really don’t give a flying one about the wendyball club 5 "Freedom without socialism is privilege and injustice, socialism without freedom is slavery and brutality" - Mikhail Bakunin
The Blues Ox Posted March 17 Posted March 17 Personally I would like both Town and Fax to do well although I am finding the bleating of about 5 of their fans rather satisfying. 2 1
Phil Posted March 17 Author Posted March 17 6 minutes ago, The Blues Ox said: Personally I would like both Town and Fax to do well although I am finding the bleating of about 5 of their fans rather satisfying. I used to follow both, but the vitriol of the football fans towards ‘Fax made me pick a side 3 "Freedom without socialism is privilege and injustice, socialism without freedom is slavery and brutality" - Mikhail Bakunin
The Masked Poster Posted March 17 Posted March 17 I'm struggling to see Huddersfield leaving this stadium actually. It will either be a masterstroke or consign Huddersfield to the history bin. 1
Quinskolar Posted March 17 Posted March 17 Not sure how three teams can share the same stadium. There is quite an overlap of both codes seasons.
Old Frightful Posted March 17 Posted March 17 3 hours ago, Phil said: I used to follow both, but the vitriol of the football fans towards ‘Fax made me pick a side A very similar situation over in West Hull also. 1 "SINCE 1985" (Better use it while I still can...)
daz39 Posted March 17 Posted March 17 1 hour ago, M j M said: Is anyone yet able to tell me why this is a good idea? Because it improves our IMG score We won't lose as much money as we currently do at the football ground It gives us time to stabilise the club before our own stadium is built Ken is a successful businessman and putting the sporting side of it to one side he obviously thinks this is a good deal for him and his other business interests More importantly it's on a bus route with a stop at the end of my road!!!!!! 2 HGSA.org.uk proudly partnering with https://www.sportsandbetting.net/ the ultimate destination for people who enjoy sports betting.
Chrispmartha Posted March 17 Posted March 17 It seems absolute madness to me, but Ken Davy must know what he’s doing.
Old Frightful Posted March 17 Posted March 17 Has he really bought it with a view to Huddersfield playing there, even temporarily? Seems odd if so, I would have thought it was just an investment. He has far more brass than me so he must know what he's doing. "SINCE 1985" (Better use it while I still can...)
M j M Posted March 17 Posted March 17 1 hour ago, daz39 said: Because it improves our IMG score We won't lose as much money as we currently do at the football ground It gives us time to stabilise the club before our own stadium is built Ken is a successful businessman and putting the sporting side of it to one side he obviously thinks this is a good deal for him and his other business interests More importantly it's on a bus route with a stop at the end of my road!!!!!! Inconceivable that Huddersfield moving out of Huddersfield is being met with such acceptance by fans when leaving a club's home town is usually a club killer. What reduction in crowd size is built into this improvement of the IMG score assumption? Does the RFL have to approve this extraordinary move away from Huddersfield? 1
JM2010 Posted March 17 Posted March 17 This move is the equivalent of Warrington moving to play in Widnes
Anita Bath Posted March 18 Posted March 18 1 hour ago, JM2010 said: This move is the equivalent of Warrington moving to play in Widnes No…Widnes have a great Stadium, Halifax have the Shay. 1 2
Worzel Posted March 18 Posted March 18 9 hours ago, M j M said: Is anyone yet able to tell me why this is a good idea? Because enough people don’t seem to want to support the Giants in Huddersfield and so an eventual merger in a few years after their few fans have got used to the commute might make sense? Huddersfax Giant Blue Socked Eagles 1 1
Just Browny Posted March 18 Posted March 18 5 hours ago, Anita Bath said: No…Widnes have a great Stadium, Halifax have the Shay. The Shay is a decent stadium that could be made into a good one with a fairly modest investment. Plenty of seats; two good, not-crumbling, fully-covered terraces, sensible capacity for RL, short walk to town centre and train station. Downsides are the quality of the grass surface and only modest amount of corporate facilities. If Huddersfield are to make this work - and I have my doubts - they will need to go 'all out' on the fact they have full control over the ground and make it the place to be on matchdays with a good and inclusive gameday experience. 4 I can confirm 30+ less sales for Scotland vs Italy at Workington, after this afternoons test purchase for the Tonga match, £7.50 is extremely reasonable, however a £2.50 'delivery' fee for a walk in purchase is beyond taking the mickey, good luck with that, it's cheaper on the telly.
gingerjon Posted March 18 Posted March 18 9 hours ago, Chrispmartha said: ... but Ken Davy must know what he’s doing. There is an assumption, repeated several times on this thread, that because someone has money they must be smart and have deeply considered motivations. I encounter some very affluent people pretty much every day. Some meet that, some were born with money, some are very successful in a field where that gets you money, but plenty have just got a bit fortunate a couple of times and held on to some decent cash as a result. I have no idea where Davy fits in that spectrum but wouldn't necessarily assume that just because he is successful and has the money to put ideas in place, it means it's well thought through or strategic. Sometimes a bad idea is a bad idea. 3 Build a man a fire, and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. (Terry Pratchett)
Henson Park Old Firm Posted March 18 Posted March 18 3 minutes ago, gingerjon said: There is an assumption, repeated several times on this thread, that because someone has money they must be smart and have deeply considered motivations. I encounter some very affluent people pretty much every day. Some meet that, some were born with money, some are very successful in a field where that gets you money, but plenty have just got a bit fortunate a couple of times and held on to some decent cash as a result. I have no idea where Davy fits in that spectrum but wouldn't necessarily assume that just because he is successful and has the money to put ideas in place, it means it's well thought through or strategic. Sometimes a bad idea is a bad idea. London Broncos.... 1 1
langpark Posted March 18 Posted March 18 (edited) 22 minutes ago, gingerjon said: There is an assumption, repeated several times on this thread, that because someone has money they must be smart and have deeply considered motivations. I encounter some very affluent people pretty much every day. Some meet that, some were born with money, some are very successful in a field where that gets you money, but plenty have just got a bit fortunate a couple of times and held on to some decent cash as a result. I have no idea where Davy fits in that spectrum but wouldn't necessarily assume that just because he is successful and has the money to put ideas in place, it means it's well thought through or strategic. Sometimes a bad idea is a bad idea. The Ken Davy comments I see on this forum usually comment about what a great man (borderline philanthropist) he is. I don't see anyone claiming he is a genius of a sports administrator. I know nothing about him, but after a quick wikipedia search, I see that he is 84 years old, so I give him credit for his dedication and commitment to the cause! He clearly has the money, and is passionate about RL. What he needs to go with that is a team of 'experts' who know how to run a sporting organisation. The older he gets, the more critical it becomes that he leaves the club in capable hands. Edited March 18 by langpark 3
The Blues Ox Posted March 18 Posted March 18 11 hours ago, M j M said: Is anyone yet able to tell me why this is a good idea? Giants moving to the Shay gets them through the 15 point mark for IMG and guarentees their SL status. If they don't move they are at risk. The irony if a year in IMG disappear in to the distance in typical RFl style. 2 1
Chrispmartha Posted March 18 Posted March 18 2 minutes ago, The Blues Ox said: Giants moving to the Shay gets them through the 15 point mark for IMG and guarentees their SL status. If they don't move they are at risk. The irony if a year in IMG disappear in to the distance in typical RFl style. Isn’t that assuming they keep their current attendance levels though? 1
Ainley Top Posted March 18 Posted March 18 1 hour ago, Worzel said: Because enough people don’t seem to want to support the Giants in Huddersfield and so an eventual merger in a few years after their few fans have got used to the commute might make sense? Huddersfax Giant Blue Socked Eagles Don't be silly! 1
Gooleboy Posted March 18 Posted March 18 1 hour ago, Worzel said: Because enough people don’t seem to want to support the Giants in Huddersfield and so an eventual merger in a few years after their few fans have got used to the commute might make sense? Huddersfax Giant Blue Socked Eagles Huddersfax or Halifield, either or! 2
The Blues Ox Posted March 18 Posted March 18 8 minutes ago, Chrispmartha said: Isn’t that assuming they keep their current attendance levels though? I'd be amazed if they dropped below the >3000 level. 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now